aMule Forum
English => Feature requests => Topic started by: hbbk on September 07, 2006, 07:23:24 PM
-
hi,
Yes I do read the feature Not to request thread !!! But now that big daddy will implement it (http://www.emule-project.net/home/perl/help.cgi?l=1&rm=show_topic&topic_id=848) don't you think it is time to goes on and follow the movment ?
best
-
hmm looks like it :rolleyes:
-
Hi
I'd really like it too, since most if not all of the ISP around are now filtering p2p protocol around here. Not sure it will be working tough, but at least it will make things harder for those .
++
-
(http://forum.amule.org/images/bunfirlite/icons/icon16.gif)
-
I've tried new amule 0.47b and protocol obfuscation solved my problem. We'd love a version of amule with this feature, disabled by default if you want
-
Originally posted by hbbk
But now that big daddy will implement it (http://www.emule-project.net/home/perl/help.cgi?l=1&rm=show_topic&topic_id=848) don't you think it is time to goes on and follow the movment ?
Kry has already stated that it will be implemented (http://forum.amule.org/thread.php?postid=59286#post59286).
EDIT:
Originally posted by Guilo
I've tried new amule 0.47b and protocol obfuscation solved my problem. We'd love a version of amule with this feature, disabled by default if you want
Just to avoid confusion, eMule 0.47b has protocol obfuscation already implemented, aMule does not.
-
I've heard eMule 0.47b works well against the network throtling done by Spanish cable ISP "ONO". I know some people are configuring their 0.47b and 0.47c eMules to "only communicate with obfuscation". They are currently about 20% of the network.
I think obfuscation compatible with mainline standard eMule should be implemented in aMule.
Best regards.
-
Please, guys.
Read the post above yours. What do you read? It will be implemented.
If you want to speed up the process send some money (the more money, the faster will they be working) to the one who's coding this. Or just wait a bit longer.
-
You are right, wuischke. I failed to read that sentence in lionel77's post.
Regards.