aMule Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

We're back! (IN POG FORM)

Pages: 1 ... 5 6 [7] 8

Author Topic: protocol obfuscation  (Read 81750 times)

Axl_Mas

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Karma: 1
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 73
Re: protocol obfuscation
« Reply #90 on: May 17, 2007, 11:01:28 AM »
Quote from: Kry on March 08, 2007, 04:33:10 PM
Weeks.

How many others?
Do you think that the possible cvs relase can be relase before the summer holiday or after there?
Thanks for your hard work....i love aMule!!!
Logged

wuischke

  • Developer
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Karma: 183
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4292
Re: protocol obfuscation
« Reply #91 on: May 17, 2007, 11:07:54 AM »
Protocol obfuscation is intended to be finished in Mai.
Logged

Axl_Mas

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Karma: 1
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 73
Re: protocol obfuscation
« Reply #92 on: May 17, 2007, 11:30:17 AM »
Quote from: wuischke on May 17, 2007, 11:07:54 AM
Protocol obfuscation is intended to be finished in Mai.

GREAT!!!!!!!!!
Logged

rafuean

  • Approved Newbie
  • *
  • Karma: 0
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5
Re: protocol obfuscation
« Reply #93 on: May 17, 2007, 12:31:03 PM »
Quote from: Axl_Mas on May 17, 2007, 11:30:17 AM
Quote from: wuischke on May 17, 2007, 11:07:54 AM
Protocol obfuscation is intended to be finished in Mai.

GREAT!!!!!!!!!

don't be so happy, he didn't told the year xD
Logged

wuischke

  • Developer
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Karma: 183
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4292
Re: protocol obfuscation
« Reply #94 on: May 17, 2007, 01:25:45 PM »
Oh, you might be surprised to hear that aMule 2.1.3 isn't supposed to become one year as the latest stable release either.
Logged

todzuallen

  • Approved Newbie
  • *
  • Karma: 0
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 6
Re: protocol obfuscation
« Reply #95 on: June 01, 2007, 07:09:23 AM »
This doesn't really matter so much anymore as my ISP rogers has started slowing down all encrypted traffic now.
Logged

bertoldic

  • Newbie
  • Karma: 0
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1
Re: protocol obfuscation
« Reply #96 on: June 07, 2007, 08:49:35 AM »
A suggestion...

In Italy we have huge proplems with QoS policies and amule.Even other countries are moving towards these kind of policies.So no protocol obfuscation no amule.We can use emule also with wine if we use Linux.
I suggest you to develop this protocol if not users will not use amule.People are not interested in the slowest  p2p software...
Logged

wuischke

  • Developer
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Karma: 183
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4292
Re: protocol obfuscation
« Reply #97 on: June 07, 2007, 11:15:31 AM »
Geez. You did read some other posts of this topic, didn't you? Protocol Obfuscation is being implemented, there's no use in requesting it again and again.

The only reason why it isn't finished yet is the real life of developers. The responsible developer is currently on vacation.
I'm far from home surrounded by Windows computers, too, but if it makes you happy I can tell you that there has already been an encrypted file transfer between two aMule clients a day before I left.
Expect further development as of next week.

btw: I really don't like the way you write.
Logged

KafesneBikaina

  • Newbie
  • Karma: 0
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4
    • http://www.antiscreeners.com
Re: protocol obfuscation
« Reply #98 on: June 08, 2007, 04:37:07 PM »
Quote from: wuischke on June 07, 2007, 11:15:31 AM
there has already been an encrypted file transfer between two aMule clients a day before I left.
Nice!
Logged
Tenga siempre cerca, un frasco de Ubik.

Deus Ex

  • Newbie
  • Karma: 0
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1
Re: protocol obfuscation
« Reply #99 on: June 15, 2007, 05:38:02 PM »
Quote from: bertoldic on June 07, 2007, 08:49:35 AM
I suggest you to develop this protocol if not users will not use amule.People are not interested in the slowest  p2p software...

I'm from Italy too, but i dont think that we users can use such way of saying things, since the work of the aMule team is free as in freedom and as in free of charge. So, i think we can only give thanks, no one's paying them for what they've been doing. Even if i've got the problems you're talking about with my ISP, i feel good with what i have. If you dont, you can easily switch to other OS/platforms/clients.

aMule team: keep up with the good work!
Logged

Nerofumo

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Karma: 2
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 59
  • Just an old sysadm & dba
Re: protocol obfuscation
« Reply #100 on: June 15, 2007, 08:32:17 PM »
Quote from: bertoldic on June 07, 2007, 08:49:35 AM
I suggest you to develop this protocol if not users will not use amule.People are not interested in the slowest  p2p software...

All of us are waiting for protocol obfuscation but, instead of claiming the new release in such a way, I prefer to wait patiently because it means to recognize and keep respect for the work the development team's doing. After all, nobody forces us to use aMule.
Logged
Nowadays you have to think like a hero just to behave like a merely decent human being.

Axl_Mas

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Karma: 1
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 73
Re: protocol obfuscation
« Reply #101 on: July 15, 2007, 11:10:17 PM »
I tried Emule 0.48 with wine and it's working perfectly!
I'am am sad to abandon amule after 2 years of love, but it's develop is exasperated slow!
Bye aMule.....i loved you but now you are too old
Logged

Nerofumo

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Karma: 2
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 59
  • Just an old sysadm & dba
Re: protocol obfuscation
« Reply #102 on: July 16, 2007, 01:28:09 AM »
because of my job - i'm a dba consultant - i spend the most part of my time answering to people standing in front of my desk and asking "can you help me?", "may i..." "just five minutes...". I always say yes, but it's clear that they have to wait until i can spend my free time because i'm engaged in another activity. Sometimes answers come too late even if i'm trying to do my best".

I think they're trying to do their best, even if it's not too late but late enough.  ;)
Logged
Nowadays you have to think like a hero just to behave like a merely decent human being.

wuischke

  • Developer
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Karma: 183
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4292
Re: protocol obfuscation
« Reply #103 on: July 16, 2007, 08:31:22 AM »
Well, frankly, we wished development would be faster as well. We're kind of stuck right now because the developer porting Protocol Obfuscation from eMule is currently very busy and we carry a half-finished implementation in our tarball for almost 2 months. Originally we wanted to release 2.2.0 in late May, now it's mid-july. :(
Logged

skolnick

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Karma: 24
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1188
  • CentOS 6 User
Re: protocol obfuscation
« Reply #104 on: July 16, 2007, 08:34:59 AM »
Quote from: wuischke on July 16, 2007, 08:31:22 AM
Originally we wanted to release 2.2.0 in late May, now it's mid-july. :(
Notice that wuischke told no year, so please do not start whining on july 15th about "are we there yet?" ;). aMule devs are evil, and wuischke is no exception :D

Regards.
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 5 6 [7] 8
« previous next »