aMule Forum
English => en_Bugs => Topic started by: Pascal on January 25, 2004, 10:11:43 AM
-
Should aMule be compiled in debug mode? no
Should aMule be compiled with release grp code? no
Should aMule be compiled without debug reporting? yes
Should aMule be compiled with profiling? no
Should aMule be compiled with optimizations? no
Should aMule be compiled with systray? yes
Should aMule be compiled with safe systray? no
Should aMule be compiled with pure GTK code? yes
Should aMule be compiled without bar drawing? no
Should aMule be linked against patched gsocket? yes
Should amulecmd be built? yes
Should amulecmd (TextClient) be linked against wxbase? yes
Which libraries should aMule use?
wxWindows 2.4.2
GTK Not detected
Here the query of installed packages :
[root@localhost aMule-1.2.4]# rpm -qa | grep GTK
wxGTK-2.4.2-1mdk
libwxPythonGTK2.4-2.4.1.2-3mdk
wxGTK-devel-2.4.2-1
[root@localhost aMule-1.2.4]#
[root@localhost aMule-1.2.4]# rpm -qa | grep wx
wxGTK-2.4.2-1mdk
libwxPythonGTK2.4-2.4.1.2-3mdk
libwxgtk2.4-2.4.1-3mdk
wxBase-2.4.2-1
wxGTK-devel-2.4.2-1
[root@localhost aMule-1.2.4]#
Could you tell me wich one is missing ?
Thx
-
u miss gtk1 .. u have wxGTK 2.4.2 mdk rpm and wxGTK-devel from our dl page..
install gtk1 (gtk+), rpm -e all wxGTK and wxBase, dl wxGTK(-devel) & wxBase from our dl page, see my installation howto
greets
-
Hi,
A new package for amule and Mandrake a available on PLF mirrors.
See, for example : http://ftp.easynet.fr
-
hi soda!
whatŽs your experience with the plf-version? i had massive problems with former plf-builds. they depended on other wxGTK versions and were modified, so i had that 100% cpu and memory usage problem. self compiled with the recommended wxGTK versions everything was working well. maybe the actual plfŽs work better... i donŽt know.
-
yes muckmuck , ur right..
better for ppl to use our amule rpms (from the dl page) cos we know how we build them and what they need .. at least, our rpms r tested ;)