Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

[da_wild_77]

Heya I really appreciate your work here. I am using aMule since my final step forward to Linux 4 or 5 month ago. I love 2.0.rc4 with its speed and it's stability here are my experiences with it.

1 (really minor) GUI is wrong skaled in preferences optimize sources (speaking about german translation), 3rd option copy sources to another file before removing (high cpu load) isn' well readable cause it has 2 lines and it's only place for 1 line so I have 2 lines on with cutted upper half and the lower one has the lower half cutted.

intro: I have at least same speed maybe even better compared to 1.2.x

but:

2 (dunno)   I have only 150 sources compared to my usual restriction of 350 which was reached after 30 minutes with 1.2.x.
tell me whether and which further infos you need to handle this

3 (maybe the same cause) my upload queue is rather empty I have usual restriction of 2500 clients which is nearly everytime full, but now I have only 600 - 800 users in my queue. It doesn't matter really cause the upload itself is used for uploading. But I am curious what's the reason for this.

I tested 2/3 with Suse 9.1 and LFS

greets

da_wild

[phoenix]

da_wild_77,

I dont know if the problem is this, but now we have checks for agressive clients (clients that do not leave you alone for the time they should), and maybe what you see is that those clients are banned. Notice that the banning is on their bad behaviour, not on the client brand.

Cheers!

[Xaignar]

That shouldn't be, as even with 3500 clients known, I only had between 10 and 20 banned (aggressive clients are simply banned). Also, the Leech checks should not catch such a large percentage. Could it be that there simply isn't that many sources for the files you are downloading?

[da_wild_77]

Than I would see 700 clients on queue and a big bad number in brackets (x banned) actually I have only one bad guy there