aMule Forum
English => Feature requests => Topic started by: troc on March 01, 2006, 06:51:32 PM
-
Hello,
Any ideas on what kinda priority protocol obfuscation will have in amule's development ?
My isp will be introducing traffic shaping. I have just read (slyck.com) that encryption is being used in bt clients to mangle the the packets in such a way that they can't be classified by the ISP's hardware and given lower priority or bandwidth.
Keep up the great work.
Regards,
Troc.
-
None
-
My isp will be introducing traffic shaping.
Change ISP. Take legal action. This is not technical problem.
-
And besides the questionable efforts to sabotage perfectly legal software and limit the users bandwith without paying money back, there is a technical reason that makes any attempt to do so pointless.
Whatever you do to obfuscate the protocol, you have to make sure your p2p partner understands your request or you could simply shut down amule. As long as other systems can contact yours (and since _all_ clients have to be compatible you can't do major changes anyway), your provider can create filters.
Cheers,
boot
-
Well you can say what you want I support troc feature request: my ISP (free.fr) is using Service Control (http://www.cisco.com/cdc_content_elements/flash/csc/cisco_FINAL_no-loop.html) from Cisco to spy and block P2P traffic and I use protocol obfuscation in eMule 0.47 with Windows XP... and it works! Otherwise I have a Low-ID or I can't connect at all.
Protocol obfuscation in aMule please!
-
Thre will be, but right now we all have Real Life stuff and work to do.
-
What's that?
-
That's sad. I've only started using aMule a few months ago. Guess I have to go back to eMule on Windoze from now on, seeing as it's the only mule that is of any use on my bandwidth-throttling ISP. The sad thing is I can't just switch ISP as it's the only ADSL provider in the whole country. You fellas in the free country sure got it good.
-
You could run eMule 0.47c on Linux using wine as well until aMule supports protocol obfusication.
-
Originally posted by wuischke
You could run eMule 0.47c on Linux using wine as well until aMule supports protocol obfusication.
eMule with wine will be "messy" on a linux machine that is running purely as a backend server. Moreover, most people are running using old machines like me which is PII and running linux is not a problem.
Such server which is turned on 24/7 would consume a lot less power to save on electricity and low maintenance.
So, aMule daemon is still the way to go for me. Hopefully the obfuscation protocol will be implemented soon. Not trying to be pushy here but for people like us who is stuck with 1 ISP, it's really no looking good.
Keep up the good work of developing aMule.
-
Damn... i've been a amule zeallot for a number of years now, and im getting bounced from some servers just because i dont have protocol ofuscation.
Can you step up this PLEASE?
-
Soon.
-
Hi,
when i search with amule (2.1.0 version in Ubuntu Dapper) i can see this sort of response for servers so i think protocole obfuscation will be mandatory in the not too distant future :
(http://static.flickr.com/84/260752284_670bd423fe_o.png)
-
That only happens sometimes using the donkey server and if they think you've a provider which filters ed2k-packages. It's done in order to prevent sending packages over and over again which will always be filtered by the isp's routers.
Solution: Use another server or KAD.
-
I am checking eMule encryption code right now. Coding will be started really soon.
-
Originally posted by lfroen
I am checking eMule encryption code right now. Coding will be started really soon.
Thanks for your patient and happy coding :baby: !
Best regards,
Truzzone :)
-
Fantastic lfroen!
Keep us informed :-)
-
Thx!!!!!
:baby: :baby: :baby: :baby: :baby: :baby:
-
Thanks! It's sad, but today is impossible living without that!
-
Now ten years that I only work with Linux. (Unix before).
One mounth back to windows.
Because there is no ofuscation.
Sylvain.
-
Originally posted by lfroen
I am checking eMule encryption code right now. Coding will be started really soon.
I only have this to say :baby:
-
Originally posted by lfroen
I am checking eMule encryption code right now. Coding will be started really soon.
Merci :baby: :baby: :baby: :baby: :baby: :baby:
-
Hello guys... any news?
-
I think we may need to implement it ASAP. This is the result of a seach in a server:
ed2k://|file|PLEASE USE EMULE 0.47C AND ENABLE PROTOCOL OBFUSCATION TO GET RESULTS FROM THis server (xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx)|xxxxxxxxx|xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx|/
-
Go on then :P
-
Originally posted by phoenix
I think we may need to implement it ASAP. This is the result of a seach in a server:
ed2k://|file|PLEASE USE EMULE 0.47C AND ENABLE PROTOCOL OBFUSCATION TO GET RESULTS FROM THis server (xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx)|xxxxxxxxx|xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx|/
Can you send me (in PM, mail or IRC) IP of this server. I will need it for testing. Thanx.
-
Donkey Server 1 - 62.241.53.2:4242, I guess (according to the end if the capital letters)
-
Finally I will be able to use amule again!
Maybe this battle (won by the eMule users) will teach the amule people managing what to be implemented that the users requests should be taken more into account.
I don't want to be very rude, because I love your work and I thank you very much for it, but some statements like "but something like that (protocol obfuscation) will not be implemented in amule" (in the sticker "Features NOT to request") should never had been done.
Anyway, as we say in Spanish "mas vale tarde que nunca" (something like: better late than never).
-
I got the same message yesterday using emule 0.47c Morph 9.2. So adding obfuscation is not a solution.
I think a server is broken. If the message is correct and it really is from donkey server 2 (No way to verify that now teh ip is in the search result) ....
Adding and removing the DS1 & DS2 solved it for me. Restoring a backup of server.met did NOT reproduce it. I really hate this message because it suggest morph (or amule what you care about) is not good.
-
I only want to say that we (users) MUST be patient with the amule developers.
They work for free doing an excellent job, maintaining an stable software.
I would like to see this kind of cooperation in any of the companies I worked.
If you don't like amule, simply change to other client. There are many others.
Nice job and thanks.
-
If protocol ofuscation must wait some time, at least put a collumn in servers list describing if the server is running ofuscation.
Thanks.
-
Try by yourself.
The servers that i've seen using obfuscation are the Donkeyserver's #1, #2, etc...
but anyway, you still can connect to them, the only problem is that you cannot search. IF you wanna search, you can change the server for a moment...
I hope obfuscation will be implemented soon.... Because all the eMule 0.47c clients are forced to enable obfuscation, and we cannot connect to them, and we get less download rate than the official emule client.. :(
-
Enabling obfuscation on 0.47c does NOT reject non-obfuscated clients unless you specifically tell it to do so.
-
I know.
but when I went to my windows machine to use emule 0.47c to search, I couldn't search unless I enabled the option to only connect to obfuscated clients.... so I enabled it.
if you wanna try...
-
Originally posted by Kry
Enabling obfuscation on 0.47c does NOT reject non-obfuscated clients unless you specifically tell it to do so.
The begging to wonder but it's possible that most of the users only accept obfuscated clients on these servers.
The Sources on them for me dropped very sigificaly
-
It is very well possible that users try to enable "only obfuscated(not recommended)". Since obfuscation sometimes fails on Donkey server 1& 2 (because they are overloaded i guess) some users will try some other settings.
-
hi all
is there any news about the state of the obfuscation development??
sorry for asking again, I dont wanna be boring asking and asking the same one more time but just wanna know something about it.....any release date??
sorry again for being so tedious, I suposse developers must be tired of answering always the same, but I havent used windows for many years and don´t wanna install windows on noany of my machines and cant live without edonkey network, my isp is blocking ed2k traffic and I think I will have to use a fucking win again X(
thanks in advance for your answers and the great soft that you give us. keep on good work. I will wait patient.
-
In the meantime you can use eMule 0.47c with wine. It's not the best solution, but it works under Linux.
-
my server/firewall/p2p machine, which is 24/7 online, has no X system so I cant use wine on it. also other times I have used wine with networking programs didnt work really well, but I think I will have to use wine on my desktop machine while I wait for any obfuscation implementation for linux.
thx for your help.
-
Originally posted by esplinter
my server/firewall/p2p machine, which is 24/7 online, has no X system so I cant use wine on it. also other times I have used wine with networking programs didnt work really well, but I think I will have to use wine on my desktop machine while I wait for any obfuscation implementation for linux.
thx for your help.
you can use Xvnc to rune wine without X.
But the best solution is really the new version of amule that kry has been promissing. :]
-
In France (i suppose elsewhere also...), you have 2 cases with DSL : ungrouped or not ungrouped.
For ungrouped, provider make generally no filtering on P2P, so no need obfuscation.
The problem is for those who are not ungrouped, the majority !
Majority of providers make P2P filtering with switch layer 3 as Cisco, but not only for applications like aMule but for all P2P traffic, like Skype and other internet game, it's a big problem.
The french historic provider (no publicity...) makes no filtering, ungrouped or not ungrouped, so it can be a solution for those who prefer change their ISP and keep their applications.
So, obfuscation should become a standard for all P2P application if ISP continue to fliter P2P packets.
I have made as others, i have installed eMule 0.47c on WinXP, waiting for an aMule with obfuscation, but for when ?
Thanks in advance for your work.
-
Originally posted by wuischke
In the meantime you can use eMule 0.47c with wine. It's not the best solution, but it works under Linux.
There are serious stability problems with eMule under Wine. It destroyed the majority of my met files on the first run.
There's a thread over at the eMule forums tracking the usage of eMule under Wine. The consensus is that eMule + Wine is not anywhere near stable.
I have had excellent results running eMule with VMware. VMWare player is free and the performance is great. I'm running Windows 2000 (no service packs) on the virtual machine.
Here's roughly what to do:
1 Install VMware player. Download from http://www.vmware.com/download/player/ Ubuntu users can: apt-get install vmware-player
2 Make a virtual machine. Go here: http://www.easyvmx.com You want bridged networking and 96M or 128M of RAM.
3 Install a windows OS on the VM.
4 Share your aMule temp directory using Samba.
5 Install eMule and configure it. Point eMule to your aMule temp directory over the network.
6 Don't forget to enable obfuscation!
This setup is extremely stable. It's also surprisingly light on CPU usage so long as you use Windows 2000 instead of XP and avoid installing service packs. The only downside is the memory usage.
It's much better than aMule under Wine. It sucks to have your downloads corrupted.
-
OK, this didn't happen to me, but your solution seems to work just fine. Thanks for the information.
-
Originally posted by wuischke
OK, this didn't happen to me, but your solution seems to work just fine. Thanks for the information.
I should have verified my information before I posted. Someone has fixed the major bug that has plagued eMule under Wine. According to the eMule Forum's Wine thread (http://forum.emule-project.net/index.php?showtopic=42844&hl=wine&st=220) it has been fixed in Wine 9.25!
It is entirely possible that eMule runs well under the latest version of Wine.
I'd love to hear if anyone here is able to run eMule under Wine 9.25 in a stable way (for 2-3 weeks at a time without crash.) I am still gunshy from my last eMule + Wine experience to try it so early.
-
Even if it runs OK, that would be only a temporary solution for me, since we have an ed2k client - aMule. It just needs to be fixed.
-
Originally posted by Typhon
Even if it runs OK, that would be only a temporary solution for me, since we have an ed2k client - aMule. It just needs to be fixed.
Obfuscation is a new feature, not a simple bugfix. New code must be written or borrowed from eMule and then it must be tested. It may be quite a while before obfuscation make it into a stable aMule release. Then again, it could be next month. Only the devs really know and I don't think they're talking on the matter.
Many people have been unable to run aMule for months already so it makes sense to find the best way to run eMule in the meantime.
-
Well, I tried to run eMule on Crossover Office emulator yesterday evening, alas without any success It didn't even start.
-
networking runs fine on wine now,
but other stuff is not so good.
it seems that everytime they fix something they break something else :(
a bit off topic, but the wine devs need to stop concentrating on fixing "solitair" and fussing over MSI installer & MS-office and make it work with app's we dont have *nix versions of.
-
Originally posted by nubtumbler
It is entirely possible that eMule runs well under the latest version of Wine.
I'd love to hear if anyone here is able to run eMule under Wine 9.25 in a stable way (for 2-3 weeks at a time without crash.) I am still gunshy from my last eMule + Wine experience to try it so early.
Thanks very much for the tip. Wine 0.9.25 and eMule 0.47c with protocol obfuscation work fine since two days now without crash. Seems very stable with this new version of wine. With an Upload of 16ko/s, I have an average Download of 32ko/s with files sources between 2 and 50. Amule is unusable since 6 months with my isp.
Update: one week now without crash. Definitively stable. Best way waiting the developpers of amule implement protocol obfuscation, imho.
-
For those who work on MacOSX, there is Parallels Desktop (free for 1 month in evaluation) which make the same thing as VMware.
I have tested Parallels Desktop 2.2 on an iMac Core 2 Duo (1 GO RAM) in OSX 10.4.8 with WinXP SP2 (500 Mo RAM allocated) and eMule 0.47c without any problem : it's stable and efficient.
-
is obfuscation in ? we should stay compatible with emule, especially if one of the further versions is delivered with connections to obfuscation only..
-
Nah, it ain't implemented yet, but people are working on it. You know, will be implemented soon® and stuff.
In other words: There are efforts to implement this feature, but developers are busy (real life) and therefore the support is still missing.
-
Originally posted by melendro
I don't want to be very rude, because I love your work and I thank you very much for it, but some statements like "but something like that (protocol obfuscation) will not be implemented in amule" (in the sticker "Features NOT to request") should never had been done.
I agree completely. If the amule developers don't want to listen to users, that is of course their right since they work for free. But I also don't think they would want to work on amule if nobody uses it (maybe Im wrong). Now that eMule under wine works again I am happy and I will use that for a while, at least until this issue gets sorted out.
Sometimes I wish the amule developers had some innovation of their own and didn't just copy every feature from emule 1-2 years later. (like Kad)
There are other examples of features that should not be in the "never" list like anonymization and webcache. Saying "never" is just based on some personal opinions about what is "possible" or "legal". OK, right now webcache is irrelevant and anonymization is inefficient, but network technology and laws change over time, and anyone (even the devs) might change their opinion in the future.
Anyway, it's good that protocol obfuscation is coming, even though its only because they were "forced" by emule and server operators.
-
Originally posted by lulu135
Sometimes I wish the amule developers had some innovation of their own and didn't just copy every feature from emule 1-2 years later. (like Kad)
[snip]
Anyway, it's good that protocol obfuscation is coming, even though its only because they were "forced" by emule and server operators.
I had a very offensive reply written, but I decided to edit it out and let you look like an idiot by yourself.
Damn, I did it again.
-
As stated in several places, developers' aim in aMule project is to create the best client for the existing ed2k protocol.
So I am quite happy they don't introduce any "innovation" in how the protocol is handled, because that would mean creating a restricted alternate network of users of the new protocol. That's also why they don't include in the tree some "extreme" mods...
The fact that some servers decided to allow some functions (search) only to obfuscated clients, and that a lot of eMule users are activating their "obfuscate connections only" option is quite arbitrary and souldn't have happened.
The "don't ask" list is of course a right thing, in order to avoid a flood of unnecessary requests. As you see, when something is really needed, the devs take the necessary steps.
And, of course, aMule is full of innovations, only not in in the protocol section. Look at the daemon, the remote GUI and so on...
-
Originally posted by Kry
Originally posted by lulu135
Sometimes I wish the amule developers had some innovation of their own and didn't just copy every feature from emule 1-2 years later. (like Kad)
[snip]
Anyway, it's good that protocol obfuscation is coming, even though its only because they were "forced" by emule and server operators.
I had a very offensive reply written, but I decided to edit it out and let you look like an idiot by yourself.
Damn, I did it again.
Kry, you know, such people exist on every forum.... You must think that for each person like this, 100 will continue to use and love your work!!! Bye!!!
-
I use and love Kry's work :baby: :baby: :baby: :baby: :baby:
-
Dear Santa,
Can i have protocol obfuscation this Christmas??
I've really been a good boy... please?
:))
-
I'm not Santa, but: No, I doubt it.
-
what is the current status?
-
Working on it.
-
Great thanks, we need it... 8o
:baby:
-
Servers doesn't allow search function for us without obfuscation... ;( :evil:
-
Change server, try DonkeyServer N 1 2 3 ;)
Best regards,
Truzzone :)
-
Hi!
Originally posted by Kry
Working on it.
Thanks a lot!
In Brazil (specifically BrasilTelecom Network) if you don't use obfuscation, your network traffic is dropped down above 1-2 hours.
And I haven't any other choice to change DSL provider for now.
Again, thanks for working on it :baby: :baby: :baby: :baby: :baby:
-
Network traffic is dropped even on Donkey2... you can search, but without obfuscation your ISP block your internet traffic...
So not a real solution... :rolleyes:
-
how long have we to wait for?
just to know if i've to reinstall windows and emule in the while
thanks..
-
Do you know wine? ;)
I don't know how long this will take, but I can ensure you, that the code is currently being implemented.
-
Originally posted by wuischke
Do you know wine? ;)
I don't know how long this will take, but I can ensure you, that the code is currently being implemented.
but... days... weeks... months?
-
I hope day... :-)
A would say it if it is only day.
No, probably months... :-(
OK.
Thank you for your work and, even without the obfuscation, that make the software more and more obsolete, it is a great piece of code.
Really thank you.
(Pssss... Where I can find wine? :-) (It's a joke... we wait!)
P.S. Really, it can help if all the reader of this forum make a donation?
-
Hello people
In italy now, from two day, i can't download and upload go down every ten minutes ;(.
Thank's to all developer for the work we are doing, i wait it. :baby:
Bye.
-
Both Gnutella and plain eDonkey are flat dead. I can hardly find any peer up.
All the connected peers use emule *with protocol obfuscation enabled*; just
open the "clients" window on aMule, and see by yourself. This makes it
impossible to use the P2P network, and amule in particular, unless you have
a windows machine with obfuscation enabled eMule. The last release of
aMule dates back to June 2006, which smells like dead mule. Kry claims
to be working on it, but there is no sign of progress (the source does not
compile on my machine). There is also no sign of OSX clients for obfuscated
eDonkey. Overall, this makes a big RIP sign on P2P for OSX. Do you have
anything positive to say? I am feeling in low moods, and I need to cheer up.
-
there is no sign of progress
Take a look at the sources and you'll see that there are many chances regarding Protocol Obfuscation.
The last release of aMule dates back to June 2006, which smells like dead mule.
Take a look ath the release dates here: eMule sf.net project (http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=53489&package_id=47913) or even worse aMule releases (http://www.amule.org/wiki/index.php/Releases)
I don't smell dead mule, I smell development of very complex applications by too few people.
I am feeling in low moods, and I need to cheer up.
Will a 'Protocol Obfuscation integration is under heavy constructions' do?
-
> Will a 'Protocol Obfuscation integration is under heavy constructions' do?
... much better. Thank you!
-
It's only my impression or the last cvs has a working protocol obfuscation?
I don't see the option in the gui about that, but now i can enter in any server!
-
Hi Axl_Mas,
I wish you were right, but no, we still have no working protocol obfuscation. Work is in progress, though.
-
Hi Axl_Mas,
I wish you were right, but no, we still have no working protocol obfuscation. Work is in progress, though.
Ok! :(
When it will be ready in cvs, can you annunce in main page?
TNX
-
Of course! :D
-
Can you say when could we have the protocol obfuscation in amule cvs?
days? weeks? months?
I hate my ISP but I can't change it! >:(
Thanks for your work and patience.
-
Weeks.
-
Hi!
Weeks.
Very good notice, Kry!
-
I hope this gets implimented soon I had to switch to running emule under wine.
-
Weeks.
Great news Kry!!!!!!!!!!!!
Thanks for the hard job!
-
Weeks.
OMG OMG OMG OMG come on guys I can't wait :-)
I'd love to remove NeoMule on Wine...
-
I really don't get it.. I've never gone through the problem where this obfuscation thing affects my downloads..
I mean, just keep the six DonkeyServers in your list and only those six. If you want to search for anything, connect to DS2 and search without any problems. Afterthat, leave it to auto-select any other server depending on your disconnections or load etc...
I still max out my connection on a daily basis with aMule alone, and I still can download / search for whatever i want.
I don't see the reason for switching to other apps through wine.
Edit, and this has been done in two different countries with two different ISPs in each, all of which traffic shape or have restrictions nowadays unfortunately...
-
Hi xushi!
Protocol obfuscation is necessary for some people whose ISP filters based on traffic instead of ports (they block traffic, instead of just shape it) so some people need this badly. For me is also transparent if this is implemented or not, since aMule works fine for me, but if implemented, aMule will work better for many people.
Regards.
-
Weeks.
Thanks!!!!
-
it's nearing close to a month since the last post on this... I hope it's almost done :)
-
I hoped for this on Christmas...
-
be a little more patient. We have been waiting for this for almost a year now. A few more months should be no problem. Knowing that the developer is doing it really helps. Keep up the good work amule developers.
-
Weeks.
How many others?
Do you think that the possible cvs relase can be relase before the summer holiday or after there?
Thanks for your hard work....i love aMule!!!
-
Protocol obfuscation is intended to be finished in Mai.
-
Protocol obfuscation is intended to be finished in Mai.
GREAT!!!!!!!!!
-
Protocol obfuscation is intended to be finished in Mai.
GREAT!!!!!!!!!
don't be so happy, he didn't told the year xD
-
Oh, you might be surprised to hear that aMule 2.1.3 isn't supposed to become one year as the latest stable release either.
-
This doesn't really matter so much anymore as my ISP rogers has started slowing down all encrypted traffic now.
-
A suggestion...
In Italy we have huge proplems with QoS policies and amule.Even other countries are moving towards these kind of policies.So no protocol obfuscation no amule.We can use emule also with wine if we use Linux.
I suggest you to develop this protocol if not users will not use amule.People are not interested in the slowest p2p software...
-
Geez. You did read some other posts of this topic, didn't you? Protocol Obfuscation is being implemented, there's no use in requesting it again and again.
The only reason why it isn't finished yet is the real life of developers. The responsible developer is currently on vacation.
I'm far from home surrounded by Windows computers, too, but if it makes you happy I can tell you that there has already been an encrypted file transfer between two aMule clients a day before I left.
Expect further development as of next week.
btw: I really don't like the way you write.
-
there has already been an encrypted file transfer between two aMule clients a day before I left.
Nice!
-
I suggest you to develop this protocol if not users will not use amule.People are not interested in the slowest p2p software...
I'm from Italy too, but i dont think that we users can use such way of saying things, since the work of the aMule team is free as in freedom and as in free of charge. So, i think we can only give thanks, no one's paying them for what they've been doing. Even if i've got the problems you're talking about with my ISP, i feel good with what i have. If you dont, you can easily switch to other OS/platforms/clients.
aMule team: keep up with the good work!
-
I suggest you to develop this protocol if not users will not use amule.People are not interested in the slowest p2p software...
All of us are waiting for protocol obfuscation but, instead of claiming the new release in such a way, I prefer to wait patiently because it means to recognize and keep respect for the work the development team's doing. After all, nobody forces us to use aMule.
-
I tried Emule 0.48 with wine and it's working perfectly!
I'am am sad to abandon amule after 2 years of love, but it's develop is exasperated slow!
Bye aMule.....i loved you but now you are too old
-
because of my job - i'm a dba consultant - i spend the most part of my time answering to people standing in front of my desk and asking "can you help me?", "may i..." "just five minutes...". I always say yes, but it's clear that they have to wait until i can spend my free time because i'm engaged in another activity. Sometimes answers come too late even if i'm trying to do my best".
I think they're trying to do their best, even if it's not too late but late enough. ;)
-
Well, frankly, we wished development would be faster as well. We're kind of stuck right now because the developer porting Protocol Obfuscation from eMule is currently very busy and we carry a half-finished implementation in our tarball for almost 2 months. Originally we wanted to release 2.2.0 in late May, now it's mid-july. :(
-
Originally we wanted to release 2.2.0 in late May, now it's mid-july. :(
Notice that wuischke told no year, so please do not start whining on july 15th about "are we there yet?" ;). aMule devs are evil, and wuischke is no exception :D
Regards.
-
No, I was not talking about the release date of 2.2.0, but about the current date.
-
aMule devs are evil, and wuischke is no exception :D
sure they are, evil as hell ;D
-
Too late, It is already implemented since 19 August.
P.S. Please cease to post big images in every post or remove your signature. Since I'm using 1024x768 again I get easily annoyed and removing a post is far easier than editing out the image.
-
Obf will never be added to aMule.
FUD.
Given the fact it has been added for months, the TCP one, and for weeks, the TCP and UDP one.
Please restrain from posting false statements, insults, or any other similar thing. I am even less prone to pacience than wuischke is, so I'll proceed from now on to remove every post with any of those components, no questions asked or answered. Like I did already.
-
Obf will never be added to aMule.
Yes, and this is alll in our dreams (http://www.oldfrog.info/Linux/divers/obfusc_option.jpg)
-
Hi folks
So is Protocol Obfuscation working now in current SVN, or is it implemented but disabled? If it works, I will make some test on my machine...
Bye and thaks to all!!!!
-
It is implemented, works and support is enabled by default. You'll find the settings in preferences->security.
-
Thanks wuischke!!! I'm going to compile and use amuled + amulegui updating my old installation that doesn't have PO. Do I need to add something manually in amule.conf or will amuled add the proper lines (and eventually other modifications) itself? Bye!
-
It will add everything by itself, but you might have to enable obfuscation support manually.
"Support Protocol Obfuscation" and "Use obfuscation for outgoing connections" -> You are in hybrid mode, fully supporting obfuscated and non-obfuscated connections.
"Accept only obfuscated connections" -> You support only obfuscated connections, this will most probably have a negative effect on the number of sources and no positive effects for normal users.
-
My provider doesn`t limit my p2p speed so "I" don`t need that feature. But as there are many other people with such providers I would go into hybrid mode for sure. All profit that way.
Great job done.
-
Hi all,
Some months ago I've been forced to leave my loved aMule and begin using emulev48a under wine, for my ISP (the only one I can have in my location) begun cutting bandwith for p2p protocols.
Now I'm happy! I've returned to aMule!
Thank you guys for your efforts and your patience. I love you!
Quim.
-
aMule 2.2.1 released with Protocol Obfuscation! Thanks!
Goodbye Windows and/or Wine!
Too bad last Ubuntu 8.04 ships only aMule 2.2.0~svn20080218-0ubuntu4 Hope they'll update the repository with last binaries.
-
Jonathan Métillon, aMule 2.2.0~svn20080218-0ubuntu4 has Protocol Obfuscation.
Please see http://forum.amule.org/index.php?topic=15230.0 for aMule 2.2.1 Ubuntu 8.04 deb packages