aMule Forum

English => aMule Help => Topic started by: boutros on October 16, 2004, 01:45:27 PM

Title: Stability on AMD64
Post by: boutros on October 16, 2004, 01:45:27 PM
Just got the client uptime to 7 days - You  should probably consider aMule on AMD64 to be stable

--
[fileheaven][CHN][KOR][FIN][MVGroup] running aMule 2.0.0rc6 (uptime 7 days 00 hours)
On Razorback 2 [195.245.244.243:4661] with High ID
Down: 75.4  Up: 12.0  (3814 clients waiting)
Down (Session/Total) 28.98GB/55.88GB
Up   (Session/Total) 7113.98MB/15.04GB
Title: Re: Stability on AMD64
Post by: phoenix on October 16, 2004, 05:19:38 PM
boutros,

Great news! Thanks for your report.

Cheers!
Title: Re: Stability on AMD64
Post by: stefanero on October 16, 2004, 10:28:17 PM
maybe also tell it the gentoo devs ;)
so they mark aMule stable.... :)
Title: Re: Stability on AMD64
Post by: boutros on October 17, 2004, 05:42:18 PM
Done.

Gentoo devs want stability reports added to their Bugzilla (http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=67890)

Quote
Bug 67890 has been added to the database
Title: Re: Stability on AMD64
Post by: phoenix on October 18, 2004, 02:02:06 AM
boutros,

Thanks! Very kind of you.

Cheers!
Title: Re: Stability on AMD64
Post by: boutros on October 18, 2004, 09:40:28 PM
No problem!
Title: Re: Stability on AMD64
Post by: magneto on October 20, 2004, 08:10:11 AM
any tip to make it run under fedora core 2 (of course also in an AMD 64bits)

thanks
Title: Re: Stability on AMD64
Post by: stefanero on October 20, 2004, 08:22:28 AM
may tipp would be since gentoo compiles it all
that you remove any rpms and recompile wxGTK and aMule from scratch....
and better to use 2.5.3 since 2.4.2 is pretty old and might not support 64b so well.

stefanero
Title: Re: Stability on AMD64
Post by: boutros on October 21, 2004, 10:02:57 PM
Hi, I just got this reply from the Gentoo devs re my stability report

Quote
------- Additional Comment #1 From Jon Hood  2004-10-19 19:59 PST -------

While i may agree with you, I stand behind my philosophy that gentoo users are not beta testers unless they choose to be. If the upstream developers think it is only worthy to be called a release candidate, I'd rather wait for what they think of as a stable release. If on the other hand you find something horribly wrong with the current version in portage, I'd be glad for an excuse like that to mark an rc stable, especially one like this ;).
Title: Re: Stability on AMD64
Post by: deltaHF on October 21, 2004, 10:45:39 PM
tell him, it's RC cos of MAC OSX .. for linux - it's stable

cheers ;)