aMule Forum
English => aMule Help => Topic started by: boutros on October 16, 2004, 01:45:27 PM
-
Just got the client uptime to 7 days - You should probably consider aMule on AMD64 to be stable
--
[fileheaven][CHN][KOR][FIN][MVGroup] running aMule 2.0.0rc6 (uptime 7 days 00 hours)
On Razorback 2 [195.245.244.243:4661] with High ID
Down: 75.4 Up: 12.0 (3814 clients waiting)
Down (Session/Total) 28.98GB/55.88GB
Up (Session/Total) 7113.98MB/15.04GB
-
boutros,
Great news! Thanks for your report.
Cheers!
-
maybe also tell it the gentoo devs ;)
so they mark aMule stable.... :)
-
Done.
Gentoo devs want stability reports added to their Bugzilla (http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=67890)
Bug 67890 has been added to the database
-
boutros,
Thanks! Very kind of you.
Cheers!
-
No problem!
-
any tip to make it run under fedora core 2 (of course also in an AMD 64bits)
thanks
-
may tipp would be since gentoo compiles it all
that you remove any rpms and recompile wxGTK and aMule from scratch....
and better to use 2.5.3 since 2.4.2 is pretty old and might not support 64b so well.
stefanero
-
Hi, I just got this reply from the Gentoo devs re my stability report
------- Additional Comment #1 From Jon Hood 2004-10-19 19:59 PST -------
While i may agree with you, I stand behind my philosophy that gentoo users are not beta testers unless they choose to be. If the upstream developers think it is only worthy to be called a release candidate, I'd rather wait for what they think of as a stable release. If on the other hand you find something horribly wrong with the current version in portage, I'd be glad for an excuse like that to mark an rc stable, especially one like this ;).
-
tell him, it's RC cos of MAC OSX .. for linux - it's stable
cheers ;)