aMule Forum

English => aMule Help => Topic started by: vixfiles on July 15, 2005, 01:33:53 AM

Title: debs from vollstrecker, why gtk1.2?
Post by: vixfiles on July 15, 2005, 01:33:53 AM

Why wxgtk2.6 deb from vollestrecker needs gtk1.2 and not gtk2? ... gtk1.2 are really ugly :D

and .. vollstrecker, thanks for your packages.

Title: Re: debs from vollstrecker, why gtk1.2?
Post by: Kry on July 15, 2005, 01:43:57 AM

We don't do that packages. We don't decide about that packages. We don't give support about that packages. We just put news up when someone does something for the comunity, like this debian packages stuff.

For suport on that matters, you can contact that guy. You know his nick, you can write him a PM here or mail him, his contact info is on the package as well.

We do the code, that's all. For third-party binaries like this one, you have to contact the person that created it.

Title: Re: debs from vollstrecker, why gtk1.2?
Post by: vixfiles on July 15, 2005, 01:55:48 AM

Ok Kry, you have the reason. I'll contact with Vollestrecker.
Thanks for your answer.

Title: Re: debs from vollstrecker, why gtk1.2?
Post by: Vollstrecker on July 15, 2005, 05:21:34 PM

I adopted the wx-pkg's from thedude, but afaik wx-2.6 and gtk2 don't work very well together.

Title: Re: debs from vollstrecker, why gtk1.2?
Post by: thedude0001 on July 15, 2005, 09:53:41 PM

The point is that in some setups the use of gtk2 has caused severe memleaks. That's why I chose gtk1.2, just a matter of stability and resource friendliness being more important than eye candy to me ;)

Title: Re: debs from vollstrecker, why gtk1.2?
Post by: vixfiles on July 19, 2005, 01:10:53 PM

Now, wxgtk2.6 are in debian/experimental but the names of packages are changed.

Title: Re: debs from vollstrecker, why gtk1.2?
Post by: thedude0001 on July 19, 2005, 10:23:50 PM

Oh, looks like they got the license problems figured out... And the naming as "libwxgtk2.6" is not new, that's just the way Debian names library packages...

Title: Re: debs from vollstrecker, why gtk1.2?
Post by: Vollstrecker on July 19, 2005, 10:41:22 PM

Why are they named different? When I look at mine, they are the same, and I think thedude's are named the same way.

Title: Re: debs from vollstrecker, why gtk1.2?
Post by: vixfiles on July 20, 2005, 02:23:02 PM

I want to say that, now, the package in experimental "libwxbase2.6" don't exists, i confused it with "wx-2.6-common"

P.D: Sorry for my english ...

P.D.2: apt-cache show amule
Package: amule
Version: 2.0.3-1
Priority: optional
Section: x11
Maintainer: vixfiles
Depends: libc6 (>= 2.3.2.ds1-21), libgcc1 (>= 1:4.0.0-9), libstdc++6 (>= 4.0.1), libwxgtk2.6-0 (>= 2.6.1.1), libx11-6 | xlibs (>> 4.1.0), zlib1g (>= 1:1.2.1)
Architecture: i386
Filename: ./amule_2.0.3-1_i386.deb
Size: 2120240
Installed-Size: 6140
MD5sum: 529c69fca45875c49ec8960f039edbf5
Description:
 

It works well, at this moment  ;)