aMule Forum

English => aMule Help => Topic started by: pnb666 on January 22, 2004, 05:12:26 PM

Title: amule 1.2.4 is slower then xmule 1.4.3
Post by: pnb666 on January 22, 2004, 05:12:26 PM
why ??
since have tooken the highier than xmule 1.4.3 the download is too low !!
and *mule take too cpu resource

else amule it's good ?(
Title: Re: amule 1.2.4 is slower then xmule 1.4.3
Post by: deltaHF on January 22, 2004, 07:22:28 PM
if u tell us your settings we could help u more
Title: thanks but
Post by: pnb666 on January 22, 2004, 10:36:08 PM
i have a debian woody
so the install is make by the .deb
so you howto don't help me
why is to slow !!

ps : i saw your how to
Title: and
Post by: pnb666 on January 22, 2004, 10:40:58 PM
i have a routeur configured correctly
and amule run a 1GHz amd with 256mo DDR
and 120go hard disk
Title: Re: amule 1.2.4 is slower then xmule 1.4.3
Post by: Kry on January 23, 2004, 12:37:22 AM
Did you compile the wxGTK yourself?
Title: Re: amule 1.2.4 is slower then xmule 1.4.3
Post by: quadfour on January 23, 2004, 08:28:55 AM
I'm finding the same. On a P3-1Ghz (Mandrake 9.2), everything compiled (yes, WxGTK too). On my system it uses a minimum 20% CPU usage although I have got it doing a fair bit of work. It needs a way to tune down its updating of transfer views etc...

Don't get me wrong here, aMule is a kick ass program, does the job really well, just uses _way_ more CPU than the last aMule I had (1.1.2). Oh yeh, that Gnome status thing rarely works too but thats just superficial.

Michael
Title: Re: amule 1.2.4 is slower then xmule 1.4.3
Post by: Kry on January 23, 2004, 08:50:34 AM
Strange. Should get LESS CPU.
Title: Re: amule 1.2.4 is slower then xmule 1.4.3
Post by: pnb666 on January 23, 2004, 10:36:26 AM
it's the .deb which compiled the wxGTK ?!?
and amule take 90% of resource of my cpu, it isn't normal ??
on 1GHz ??
Title: Re: amule 1.2.4 is slower then xmule 1.4.3
Post by: Kry on January 23, 2004, 10:42:28 AM
Of course not! I have 1.3Ghz and it takes no more than 15%, usually 12%.

You should reconsider compiling wxGTK and amule yourself.
Title: Re: amule 1.2.4 is slower then xmule 1.4.3
Post by: deltaHF on January 23, 2004, 10:42:46 AM
uninstall the debian wxGTK pkg, uninstall aMule, look at my aMule compilation howto and do all the steps there
Title: Re: amule 1.2.4 is slower then xmule 1.4.3
Post by: arf on January 23, 2004, 10:48:30 AM
Hi,
I'm using the pre-compiled .deb also (on a SID woody) and on my system amule usually get from 10% till 18% of my cpu (I looked with top for several minutes).
I usually compile the new versions when the deb package isn't still available with almost the same results.
oh.. I have a p800 with 384Mb of RAM and I run amule via tighvncserver...
bye,
Arf
Title: Re: amule 1.2.4 is slower then xmule 1.4.3
Post by: pnb666 on January 23, 2004, 10:56:19 AM
i will try it
thank you
Title: Re: amule 1.2.4 is slower then xmule 1.4.3
Post by: pnb666 on January 23, 2004, 11:00:36 AM
you have a sid or woody ??
what's  pkg have you compiled ??
thank
Title: i can't compile
Post by: pnb666 on January 24, 2004, 11:35:06 PM
i can't compile because i have a dependencie's problem on zlib (or gzlib i don't remeber )

when i compile wxGTK same in howto ! ?









ps i've a debian stable (woody bf2.4)
thanks ...
Title: Re: amule 1.2.4 is slower then xmule 1.4.3
Post by: thepolish on January 25, 2004, 02:47:16 PM
Hello,

See my post: http://www.amule.org/amule/thread.php?threadid=533

Hope it will help u

thepolish