aMule Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

We're back! (IN POG FORM)

Author Topic: debs from vollstrecker, why gtk1.2?  (Read 3009 times)

vixfiles

  • Newbie
  • Karma: 0
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4
debs from vollstrecker, why gtk1.2?
« on: July 15, 2005, 01:33:53 AM »
Why wxgtk2.6 deb from vollestrecker needs gtk1.2 and not gtk2? ... gtk1.2 are really ugly :D

and .. vollstrecker, thanks for your packages.
Logged

Kry

  • Ex-developer
  • Retired admin
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Karma: -665
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5795
Re: debs from vollstrecker, why gtk1.2?
« Reply #1 on: July 15, 2005, 01:43:57 AM »
We don't do that packages. We don't decide about that packages. We don't give support about that packages. We just put news up when someone does something for the comunity, like this debian packages stuff.

For suport on that matters, you can contact that guy. You know his nick, you can write him a PM here or mail him, his contact info is on the package as well.

We do the code, that's all. For third-party binaries like this one, you have to contact the person that created it.
Logged

vixfiles

  • Newbie
  • Karma: 0
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4
Re: debs from vollstrecker, why gtk1.2?
« Reply #2 on: July 15, 2005, 01:55:48 AM »
Ok Kry, you have the reason. I'll contact with Vollestrecker.
Thanks for your answer.
Logged

Vollstrecker

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Karma: 67
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1551
  • Unofficial Debian Packager
    • http://vollstreckernet.de
Re: debs from vollstrecker, why gtk1.2?
« Reply #3 on: July 15, 2005, 05:21:34 PM »
I adopted the wx-pkg's from thedude, but afaik wx-2.6 and gtk2 don't work very well together.
Logged
Homefucking is killing prostitution

thedude0001

  • evil bugfinder ;)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Karma: 6
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 827
Re: debs from vollstrecker, why gtk1.2?
« Reply #4 on: July 15, 2005, 09:53:41 PM »
The point is that in some setups the use of gtk2 has caused severe memleaks. That's why I chose gtk1.2, just a matter of stability and resource friendliness being more important than eye candy to me ;)
Logged
Das Schlimme auf dieser Welt ist
daß die Dummen so selbstsicher sind
und die Gescheiten so voller Zweifel.

vixfiles

  • Newbie
  • Karma: 0
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4
Re: debs from vollstrecker, why gtk1.2?
« Reply #5 on: July 19, 2005, 01:10:53 PM »
Now, wxgtk2.6 are in debian/experimental but the names of packages are changed.
« Last Edit: July 19, 2005, 01:11:43 PM by vixfiles »
Logged

thedude0001

  • evil bugfinder ;)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Karma: 6
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 827
Re: debs from vollstrecker, why gtk1.2?
« Reply #6 on: July 19, 2005, 10:23:50 PM »
Oh, looks like they got the license problems figured out... And the naming as "libwxgtk2.6" is not new, that's just the way Debian names library packages...
Logged
Das Schlimme auf dieser Welt ist
daß die Dummen so selbstsicher sind
und die Gescheiten so voller Zweifel.

Vollstrecker

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Karma: 67
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1551
  • Unofficial Debian Packager
    • http://vollstreckernet.de
Re: debs from vollstrecker, why gtk1.2?
« Reply #7 on: July 19, 2005, 10:41:22 PM »
Why are they named different? When I look at mine, they are the same, and I think thedude's are named the same way.
Logged
Homefucking is killing prostitution

vixfiles

  • Newbie
  • Karma: 0
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4
Re: debs from vollstrecker, why gtk1.2?
« Reply #8 on: July 20, 2005, 02:23:02 PM »
I want to say that, now, the package in experimental "libwxbase2.6" don't exists, i confused it with "wx-2.6-common"

P.D: Sorry for my english ...

P.D.2: apt-cache show amule
Package: amule
Version: 2.0.3-1
Priority: optional
Section: x11
Maintainer: vixfiles
Depends: libc6 (>= 2.3.2.ds1-21), libgcc1 (>= 1:4.0.0-9), libstdc++6 (>= 4.0.1), libwxgtk2.6-0 (>= 2.6.1.1), libx11-6 | xlibs (>> 4.1.0), zlib1g (>= 1:1.2.1)
Architecture: i386
Filename: ./amule_2.0.3-1_i386.deb
Size: 2120240
Installed-Size: 6140
MD5sum: 529c69fca45875c49ec8960f039edbf5
Description:
 

It works well, at this moment  ;)
Logged