aMule Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

We're back! (IN POG FORM)

Pages: 1 [2]

Author Topic: 10142+ error  (Read 12403 times)

Vollstrecker

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Karma: 67
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1549
  • Unofficial Debian Packager
    • http://vollstreckernet.de
Re: 10142+ error
« Reply #15 on: May 16, 2010, 09:21:11 PM »

I guess he get's his stuff from another bad dealer.
I don't know of anyone else than us two.
I think there was a git-webfrontend somewhere. Maybe a checkout from there.
That's also updated by me  8)
k, so maybe we are really the only ones that give people stuff they should better not touch. But as Stu said, if he checked that out from the git, it has no tarball content. At least I think so.
Logged
Homefucking is killing prostitution

GonoszTopi

  • The current man in charge of most things.
  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Karma: 169
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2685
Re: 10142+ error
« Reply #16 on: May 16, 2010, 11:36:25 PM »

The git repo is equivalent to the tarball content. Actually commits in the git repo are created from the tarballs - even if the tarball is later discarded and not uploaded to sourceforge (as is the case with e.g. translation-update tarballs).

But as Stu said, if he checked that out from the git, it has no tarball content. At least I think so.
Stu didn't say that.
Stoatwblr, did you use a fresh tarball, or did you apply a patch?
That might be a reason.
As he said and I pointed out, it might be the case that he used an older tarball from you, and just applied diffs (from your site) to that old tarball. I guess that diffs are from SVN, and not from actually comparing tarball content, right?
Logged
concordia cum veritate

Vollstrecker

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Karma: 67
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1549
  • Unofficial Debian Packager
    • http://vollstreckernet.de
Re: 10142+ error
« Reply #17 on: May 17, 2010, 12:49:28 AM »

The git repo is equivalent to the tarball content. Actually commits in the git repo are created from the tarballs - even if the tarball is later discarded and not uploaded to sourceforge (as is the case with e.g. translation-update tarballs).

But as Stu said, if he checked that out from the git, it has no tarball content. At least I think so.
Stu didn't say that.
Stu asked would have been the better sentence. I just understood him that way.
Stoatwblr, did you use a fresh tarball, or did you apply a patch?
That might be a reason.
As he said and I pointed out, it might be the case that he used an older tarball from you, and just applied diffs (from your site) to that old tarball. I guess that diffs are from SVN, and not from actually comparing tarball content, right?
Right, but it's going to be changed when I'm back from Netherlands next week. I wouldn't have called it reasonable if it wouldn't be possible with the patches I provide. And I think I'm the only patch-provider so far. When changing this, I maybe include a patch for last-stable to current.
Logged
Homefucking is killing prostitution

stoatwblr

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Karma: 12
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 318
Re: 10142+ error
« Reply #18 on: May 17, 2010, 09:13:24 PM »

Tarballs and patches - mainly from Vollstrecker's repo.

It's no big deal, now I know what to look for I'll run the script if needed.

« Last Edit: May 17, 2010, 09:15:01 PM by stoatwblr »
Logged

Vollstrecker

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Karma: 67
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1549
  • Unofficial Debian Packager
    • http://vollstreckernet.de
Re: 10142+ error
« Reply #19 on: May 23, 2010, 12:04:29 AM »

Jep, but the next who doesn't know will come soon.
Logged
Homefucking is killing prostitution
Pages: 1 [2]