aMule Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

We're back! (IN POG FORM)

Pages: [1] 2

Author Topic: compilation in red hat 9  (Read 10189 times)

tuxteno2006

  • Newbie
  • Karma: 0
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4
compilation in red hat 9
« on: May 25, 2006, 05:50:10 AM »
I can't compile aMule 2.1.1 in red hat 9. I've updated some packages required for wxWidgets and seems to be installed fine.

config output:
Code: [Select]
checking build system type... i686-pc-linux-gnu
checking host system type... i686-pc-linux-gnu
checking target system type... i686-pc-linux-gnu
checking for a BSD-compatible install... /usr/bin/install -c
checking whether build environment is sane... yes
checking for gawk... gawk
checking whether make sets $(MAKE)... yes
checking whether to enable maintainer-specific portions of Makefiles... no
checking for g++... g++
checking for C++ compiler default output file name... a.out
checking whether the C++ compiler works... yes
checking whether we are cross compiling... no
checking for suffix of executables...
checking for suffix of object files... o
checking whether we are using the GNU C++ compiler... yes
checking whether g++ accepts -g... yes
checking for style of include used by make... GNU
checking dependency style of g++... gcc3
checking how to run the C++ preprocessor... g++ -E
checking for gcc... gcc
checking whether we are using the GNU C compiler... yes
checking whether gcc accepts -g... yes
checking for gcc option to accept ANSI C... none needed
checking dependency style of gcc... gcc3
checking how to run the C preprocessor... gcc -E
checking whether make sets $(MAKE)... (cached) yes
checking for a BSD-compatible install... /usr/bin/install -c
checking for ranlib... ranlib
checking for bison... bison -y
checking for ranlib... (cached) ranlib
checking for strip... strip
checking for ar... ar
checking for ld... ld
checking for egrep... grep -E
checking for ANSI C header files... yes
checking for sys/types.h... yes
checking for sys/stat.h... yes
checking for stdlib.h... yes
checking for string.h... yes
checking for memory.h... yes
checking for strings.h... yes
checking for inttypes.h... yes
checking for stdint.h... yes
checking for unistd.h... yes
checking for zlib >= 1.1.4... yes (version 1.1.4)
checking whether we need the GUI... yes
checking for wx-config... /usr/bin/wx-config
checking for wxWidgets version >= 2.6.0... yes (version 2.6.3)
checking for wxWidgets static library... no
checking that wxWidgets has support for large files... yes
checking whether to use embedded Crypto... yes
checking for bfd headers... yes
checking for autopoint... yes (0.11.4)
checking for extended flex capabilities... no
configure: Your flex version doesn't support --header-file flag. This is not critical, but
 an upgrade is recomended
checking for X... libraries /usr/X11R6/lib, headers /usr/X11R6/include
checking for working alloca.h... yes
checking for alloca... yes
checking for dirent.h that defines DIR... yes
checking for library containing opendir... none required
checking for ANSI C header files... (cached) yes
checking argz.h usability... yes
checking argz.h presence... yes
checking for argz.h... yes
checking arpa/inet.h usability... yes
checking arpa/inet.h presence... yes
checking for arpa/inet.h... yes
checking fcntl.h usability... yes
checking fcntl.h presence... yes
checking for fcntl.h... yes
checking for inttypes.h... (cached) yes
checking langinfo.h usability... yes
checking langinfo.h presence... yes
checking for langinfo.h... yes
checking libintl.h usability... yes
checking libintl.h presence... yes
checking for libintl.h... yes
checking limits.h usability... yes
checking limits.h presence... yes
checking for limits.h... yes
checking locale.h usability... yes
checking locale.h presence... yes
checking for locale.h... yes
checking malloc.h usability... yes
checking malloc.h presence... yes
checking for malloc.h... yes
checking mntent.h usability... yes
checking mntent.h presence... yes
checking for mntent.h... yes
checking netdb.h usability... yes
checking netdb.h presence... yes
checking for netdb.h... yes
checking netinet/in.h usability... yes
checking netinet/in.h presence... yes
checking for netinet/in.h... yes
checking stddef.h usability... yes
checking stddef.h presence... yes
checking for stddef.h... yes
checking for stdint.h... (cached) yes
checking stdio_ext.h usability... yes
checking stdio_ext.h presence... yes
checking for stdio_ext.h... yes
checking for stdlib.h... (cached) yes
checking for string.h... (cached) yes
checking for strings.h... (cached) yes
checking sys/ioctl.h usability... yes
checking sys/ioctl.h presence... yes
checking for sys/ioctl.h... yes
checking sys/mount.h usability... yes
checking sys/mount.h presence... yes
checking for sys/mount.h... yes
checking sys/param.h usability... yes
checking sys/param.h presence... yes
checking for sys/param.h... yes
checking sys/socket.h usability... yes
checking sys/socket.h presence... yes
checking for sys/socket.h... yes
checking sys/statvfs.h usability... yes
checking sys/statvfs.h presence... yes
checking for sys/statvfs.h... yes
checking sys/time.h usability... yes
checking sys/time.h presence... yes
checking for sys/time.h... yes
checking for unistd.h... (cached) yes
checking for sys/wait.h that is POSIX.1 compatible... yes
checking for stdbool.h that conforms to C99... yes
checking for _Bool... yes
checking for an ANSI C-conforming const... yes
checking for inline... inline
checking for mode_t... yes
checking for off_t... yes
checking for size_t... yes
checking whether time.h and sys/time.h may both be included... yes
checking whether struct tm is in sys/time.h or time.h... time.h
checking for uid_t in sys/types.h... yes
checking for working volatile... yes
checking for ptrdiff_t... yes
checking whether closedir returns void... no
checking for msgfmt... /usr/bin/msgfmt
checking for gmsgfmt... /usr/bin/msgfmt
checking for xgettext... /usr/bin/xgettext
checking for msgmerge... /usr/bin/msgmerge
checking for library containing strerror... none required
checking for stdlib.h... (cached) yes
checking for unistd.h... (cached) yes
checking for getpagesize... yes
checking for working mmap... yes
checking whether we are using the GNU C Library 2.1 or newer... yes
checking whether integer division by zero raises SIGFPE... yes
checking for inttypes.h... yes
checking for stdint.h... yes
checking for unsigned long long... yes
checking for inttypes.h... yes
checking whether the inttypes.h PRIxNN macros are broken... no
checking for ld used by GCC... ld
checking if the linker (ld) is GNU ld... yes
checking for shared library run path origin... done
checking for argz.h... (cached) yes
checking for limits.h... (cached) yes
checking for locale.h... (cached) yes
checking nl_types.h usability... yes
checking nl_types.h presence... yes
checking for nl_types.h... yes
checking for malloc.h... (cached) yes
checking for stddef.h... (cached) yes
checking for stdlib.h... (cached) yes
checking for string.h... (cached) yes
checking for unistd.h... (cached) yes
checking for sys/param.h... (cached) yes
checking for feof_unlocked... yes
checking for fgets_unlocked... yes
checking for getc_unlocked... yes
checking for getcwd... yes
checking for getegid... yes
checking for geteuid... yes
checking for getgid... yes
checking for getuid... yes
checking for mempcpy... yes
checking for munmap... yes
checking for putenv... yes
checking for setenv... yes
checking for setlocale... yes
checking for stpcpy... yes
checking for strcasecmp... yes
checking for strdup... yes
checking for strtoul... yes
checking for tsearch... yes
checking for __argz_count... yes
checking for __argz_stringify... yes
checking for __argz_next... yes
checking for iconv... yes
checking for iconv declaration...
         extern size_t iconv (iconv_t cd, char * *inbuf, size_t *inbytesleft, char * *outbuf, size_t *outbytesleft);
checking for nl_langinfo and CODESET... yes
checking for LC_MESSAGES... yes
checking for bison... bison
checking version of bison... 1.35, ok
checking whether NLS is requested... yes
checking whether included gettext is requested... no
checking for GNU gettext in libc... yes
checking for getmntent in -lsun... no
checking for getmntent in -lseq... no
checking for getmntent in -lgen... no
checking for getmntent... yes
checking whether gcc needs -traditional... no
checking for pid_t... yes
checking for unistd.h... (cached) yes
checking vfork.h usability... no
checking vfork.h presence... no
checking for vfork.h... no
checking for fork... yes
checking for vfork... yes
checking for working fork... yes
checking for working vfork... (cached) yes
checking whether lstat dereferences a symlink specified with a trailing slash... yes
checking whether lstat accepts an empty string... no
checking whether lstat dereferences a symlink specified with a trailing slash... (cached) yes
checking for stdlib.h... (cached) yes
checking for GNU libc compatible malloc... yes
checking for working memcmp... yes
checking for stdlib.h... (cached) yes
checking for unistd.h... (cached) yes
checking for getpagesize... (cached) yes
checking for working mmap... (cached) yes
checking for stdlib.h... (cached) yes
checking for GNU libc compatible realloc... yes
checking sys/select.h usability... yes
checking sys/select.h presence... yes
checking for sys/select.h... yes
checking for sys/socket.h... (cached) yes
checking types of arguments for select... int,fd_set *,struct timeval *
checking for function prototypes... yes
checking whether setvbuf arguments are reversed... no
checking return type of signal handlers... void
checking whether stat accepts an empty string... no
checking for strftime... yes
checking for working strtod... yes
checking for __argz_count... (cached) yes
checking for __argz_next... (cached) yes
checking for __argz_stringify... (cached) yes
checking for endpwent... yes
checking for floor... no
checking for ftruncate... yes
checking for getcwd... (cached) yes
checking for gethostbyaddr... yes
checking for gethostbyname... yes
checking for gethostname... yes
checking for getmntent... (cached) yes
checking for getmntinfo... no
checking for getpass... yes
checking for gettimeofday... yes
checking for inet_ntoa... yes
checking for memmove... yes
checking for mempcpy... (cached) yes
checking for memset... yes
checking for munmap... (cached) yes
checking for nl_langinfo... yes
checking for select... yes
checking for setlocale... (cached) yes
checking for socket... yes
checking for sqrt... no
checking for stpcpy... (cached) yes
checking for strcasecmp... (cached) yes
checking for strchr... yes
checking for strcspn... yes
checking for strdup... (cached) yes
checking for strerror... yes
checking for strncasecmp... yes
checking for strstr... yes
checking for strtoul... (cached) yes
checking sys/resource.h usability... yes
checking sys/resource.h presence... yes
checking for sys/resource.h... yes
checking sys/timeb.h usability... yes
checking sys/timeb.h presence... yes
checking for sys/timeb.h... yes
checking for mkdir... yes
checking for getrlimit... yes
checking for setrlimit... yes
checking if the applications should be statically linked... no
checking for CVSDATE... None required
checking if this is a FreeBSD 4 or earlier system... no
checking whether ccache support should be added... no
configure: creating ./config.status
config.status: creating Makefile
config.status: creating docs/Makefile
config.status: creating docs/man/Makefile
config.status: creating intl/Makefile
config.status: creating m4/Makefile
config.status: creating src/Makefile
config.status: creating src/kademlia/Makefile
config.status: creating src/kademlia/utils/Makefile
config.status: creating src/kademlia/io/Makefile
config.status: creating src/kademlia/kademlia/Makefile
config.status: creating src/kademlia/routing/Makefile
config.status: creating src/kademlia/net/Makefile
config.status: creating src/pixmaps/Makefile
config.status: creating src/libs/Makefile
config.status: creating src/libs/ec/Makefile
config.status: creating src/libs/common/Makefile
config.status: creating src/utils/Makefile
config.status: creating src/utils/aLinkCreator/Makefile
config.status: creating src/utils/aLinkCreator/docs/Makefile
config.status: creating src/utils/aLinkCreator/src/Makefile
config.status: creating src/utils/cas/Makefile
config.status: creating src/utils/cas/docs/Makefile
config.status: creating src/utils/wxCas/Makefile
config.status: creating src/utils/wxCas/docs/Makefile
config.status: creating src/utils/wxCas/src/Makefile
config.status: creating src/utils/xas/Makefile
config.status: creating src/utils/xas/docs/Makefile
config.status: creating src/webserver/Makefile
config.status: creating src/webserver/src/Makefile
config.status: creating src/webserver/default/Makefile
config.status: creating src/webserver/php-default/Makefile
config.status: creating src/webserver/chicane/Makefile
config.status: creating unittests/Makefile
config.status: creating unittests/muleunit/Makefile
config.status: creating unittests/tests/Makefile
config.status: creating po/Makefile.in
config.status: creating Compilation.flags
config.status: creating config.h
config.status: executing depfiles commands
config.status: executing default-1 commands
config.status: creating po/POTFILES
config.status: creating po/Makefile


  Configure script has finished system check.

  Configured aMule 2.1.1 for 'i686-pc-linux-gnu'.

  aMule enabled options:

  **** aMule Core ****
  Prefix where aMule should be installed?                    /usr/local
  Should aMule be compiled with i18n support?                yes
  Should aMule be compiled in debug mode?                    no
  Should aMule be compiled with profiling?                   no
  Should aMule be compiled with optimizations?               yes
  Should aMule monolithic application be built?              yes
  Should aMule daemon version be built?                      no
  Should aMule remote gui be built? (EXPERIMENTAL)           no
  Crypto++ library/headers style?                            embedded

  **** aMule TextClient ****
  Should aMule Command Line Client be built?                 no

  **** aMule WebServer ****
  Should aMule WebServer be built?                           no

  **** aMule ED2K Links Handler ****
  Should aMule ED2K Links Handler be built?                  yes

  **** aMuleLinkCreator ****
  Should aMuleLinkCreator GUI version (alc) be built?        no
  Should aMuleLinkCreator for console (alcc) be built?       no

  **** aMule Statistics ****
  Should C aMule Statistics (CAS) be built?                  no
  Should aMule GUI Statistics (wxCas) be built?              no

  **** General Libraries and Tools ****
  Should ccache support be enabled?                          no
  Libraries aMule will use to build:
                                       wxWidgets             2.6.3
                                       crypto++              embedded
                                       zlib                  1.1.4
Make error ?(
Code: [Select]
En el fichero incluído de ED2KLinkParser.cpp:44:
FileLock.h: En destructor `CFileLock::~CFileLock()':
FileLock.h:80: `close' sin declarar (primero use esta función)
FileLock.h:80: (Cada identificador sin declarar es reportado sólo una vez para
   cada función en el que aparece.)
make[2]: *** [ED2KLinkParser.o] Error 1
make[2]: Saliendo directorio `/home/mari/prg/amule/aMule-2.1.1/src'
make[1]: *** [install-recursive] Error 1
make[1]: Saliendo directorio `/home/mari/prg/amule/aMule-2.1.1/src'
make: *** [install-recursive] Error 1
More info:
$ ls -l /usr/bin/wx*
lrwxrwxrwx    1 root     root           43 may 24 16:13 /usr/bin/wx-config -> /usr/lib/wx/config/gtk2-unicode-release-2.6
lrwxrwxrwx    1 root     root            8 may 24 16:13 /usr/bin/wxrc -> wxrc-2.6
-rwxr-xr-x    1 root     root        87951 may 24 16:13 /usr/bin/wxrc-2.6

$ ls -l /usr/local/bin/wx*
ls: /usr/local/bin/wx*: No existe el fichero o el directorio

rpm -qa | grep wx
wx-base-unicode-2.6.3-1

I've tryed some things posted in this forum, but still nothing.

Any ideas?
Logged

stefanero

  • Some Support
  • Developer
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Karma: 8
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4235
Re: compilation in red hat 9
« Reply #1 on: May 25, 2006, 09:30:34 AM »
gcc -v

plz
Logged
In its default setup, Windows XP on the Internet amounts to a car
parked in a bad part of town, with the doors unlocked, the key in
the ignition and a Post-It note on the dashboard saying, "Please
don't steal this."

tuxteno2006

  • Newbie
  • Karma: 0
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4
Re: compilation in red hat 9
« Reply #2 on: May 25, 2006, 05:43:49 PM »
Here it is...

$ gcc -v
Leyendo especificaciones de /usr/lib/gcc-lib/i386-redhat-linux/3.2.2/specs
Configurado con: ../configure --prefix=/usr --mandir=/usr/share/man --infodir=/usr/share/info --enable-shared --enable-threads=posix --disable-checking --with-system-zlib --enable-__cxa_atexit --host=i386-redhat-linux
Modelo de hilos: posix
gcc versión 3.2.2 20030222 (Red Hat Linux 3.2.2-5)
Logged

stefanero

  • Some Support
  • Developer
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Karma: 8
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4235
Re: compilation in red hat 9
« Reply #3 on: May 25, 2006, 09:13:41 PM »
well you need atleas gcc 3.3 :)
Logged
In its default setup, Windows XP on the Internet amounts to a car
parked in a bad part of town, with the doors unlocked, the key in
the ignition and a Post-It note on the dashboard saying, "Please
don't steal this."

thedude0001

  • evil bugfinder ;)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Karma: 6
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 827
Re: compilation in red hat 9
« Reply #4 on: May 25, 2006, 11:14:56 PM »
Can somebody please explain me why people are still running redhat 9? If you counf RHEL as it's successor then there have been 2 subsequent release, if you count fedora (which is what redhat itself sees as the successor for home users) they have moved 5 (five!) versions on since then...

And somehow I don't think there are still security updates for RH9, are there?
Logged
Das Schlimme auf dieser Welt ist
daß die Dummen so selbstsicher sind
und die Gescheiten so voller Zweifel.

stefanero

  • Some Support
  • Developer
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Karma: 8
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4235
Re: compilation in red hat 9
« Reply #5 on: May 25, 2006, 11:23:01 PM »
nope  :rolleyes:
Logged
In its default setup, Windows XP on the Internet amounts to a car
parked in a bad part of town, with the doors unlocked, the key in
the ignition and a Post-It note on the dashboard saying, "Please
don't steal this."

phoenix

  • Evil respawning bird from aMule Dev Team
  • Developer
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Karma: 44
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2503
  • The last shadow you'll ever see
Re: compilation in red hat 9
« Reply #6 on: May 26, 2006, 12:12:32 AM »
tuxteno2006,

If you have root access, I suggest you take some time and do an upgrade to FC5.

Cheers!
Logged

tuxteno2006

  • Newbie
  • Karma: 0
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4
Re: compilation in red hat 9
« Reply #7 on: May 26, 2006, 12:30:46 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by thedude0001
Can somebody please explain me why people are still running redhat 9? If you counf RHEL as it's successor then there have been 2 subsequent release, if you count fedora (which is what redhat itself sees as the successor for home users) they have moved 5 (five!) versions on since then...

And somehow I don't think there are still security updates for RH9, are there?

There are several explanations, you'll see:
1_ Not in every country the access to tecnology is so easy. In 3rd. world countries, to buy a new computer that can run a new SO is to expensive and many people can't.
2_ Not everybody have time to move from an old SO to a newest version every time it's available (wich is my case, I may have time at the end of the year)
3- Some people simply don't need to.
etc...

I guess some of us have to deal with this every time we need to install some new software.  :(
And no, there are no security updates, so... I'm DEFENCELESS  8o

I will try de GCC update, thanks...

P.D: sorry about my english.
Logged

stefanero

  • Some Support
  • Developer
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Karma: 8
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4235
Re: compilation in red hat 9
« Reply #8 on: May 26, 2006, 01:07:39 AM »
well about your pc hardware, linux will run fine on pretty much every pc

so upgrading to fc4-5 would fail because your hardware is to old , its not windows you know :)
Logged
In its default setup, Windows XP on the Internet amounts to a car
parked in a bad part of town, with the doors unlocked, the key in
the ignition and a Post-It note on the dashboard saying, "Please
don't steal this."

tuxteno2006

  • Newbie
  • Karma: 0
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4
Re: compilation in red hat 9
« Reply #9 on: May 26, 2006, 02:21:32 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by stefanero
well about your pc hardware, linux will run fine on pretty much every pc

so upgrading to fc4-5 would fail because your hardware is to old , its not windows you know :)

OK! i know is not windows. i'm considering an upgrade in the near future.. Anyway, updating gcc worked! now i've got it running, on my old rh9, thanks!!!!!

also, i found this page with gcc 3.3 rpms for old rh versions, for everyone who has the same problem!!!!

http://www.trilithium.com/software/misc/

thank you again, guys!!!!!
« Last Edit: May 26, 2006, 02:22:42 AM by tuxteno2006 »
Logged

phoenix

  • Evil respawning bird from aMule Dev Team
  • Developer
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Karma: 44
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2503
  • The last shadow you'll ever see
Re: compilation in red hat 9
« Reply #10 on: May 26, 2006, 03:27:05 AM »
Well, hardware should not be a problem, I run debian on a 486-DX4-100 with 16 MB memory and it routes my network just fine 8) Try to do that with windows XP  :D
Logged

masster

  • Approved Newbie
  • *
  • Karma: 0
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 12
Re: compilation in red hat 9
« Reply #11 on: May 28, 2006, 07:37:19 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by tuxteno2006
also, i found this page with gcc 3.3 rpms for old rh versions, for everyone who has the same problem!!!!

http://www.trilithium.com/software/misc/

well... odd enough... I tried upgrading from gcc 3.2.2.5 that I have presently to 3.3 but  Redhat tells me that fails dependencies... of guess what???? of 2.3.3.5 THAT I ALREADY HAVE INSTALLED...  8o

So.. plz anyone lend a hand. But don't say 'quit RedHat', for me that is not a solution.
« Last Edit: May 28, 2006, 07:37:53 PM by masster »
Logged

Gerd78

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Karma: 9
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 681
Re: compilation in red hat 9
« Reply #12 on: May 28, 2006, 07:39:49 PM »
@masster: Please post the exact error message. This is really necessary to solve the problem. And no, "Red Hat" doesn't tell you anything - these package are not Red Hat packages, they are 3rd party packages made for Red Hat.

PS: Alternatively, you might try the just released aMule 2.1.2 instead of aMule 2.1.1. The new version can be compiled with GCC 3.2 according to the ChangeLog. I didn't test, but this is what the ChangeLog suggests.
« Last Edit: May 28, 2006, 07:41:27 PM by Gerd78 »
Logged

masster

  • Approved Newbie
  • *
  • Karma: 0
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 12
Re: compilation in red hat 9
« Reply #13 on: May 28, 2006, 10:45:52 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Gerd78
@masster: Please post the exact error message. This is really necessary to solve the problem.
Install failed :
error: Failed dependencies:
   cpp = 3.2.2-5 is needed by (installed) gcc-3.2.2-5

And same goes for gcc...
Quote
Originally posted by Gerd78
 And no, "Red Hat" doesn't tell you anything - these package are not Red Hat packages, they are 3rd party packages made for Red Hat.
Let's not get picky about the words I used... I said RedHat thinking to a message issued in RedHat  environment. Or is gcc issued error messages outside RedHat?
Quote
Originally posted by Gerd78
PS: Alternatively, you might try the just released aMule 2.1.2 instead of aMule 2.1.1. The new version can be compiled with GCC 3.2 according to the ChangeLog. I didn't test, but this is what the ChangeLog suggests.
I'll try, thx. But that stupid prior error bothers me. It was the same type of error that blocked me when I tried installing other software packages.
« Last Edit: May 28, 2006, 10:47:05 PM by masster »
Logged

wuischke

  • Developer
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Karma: 183
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4292
Re: compilation in red hat 9
« Reply #14 on: May 28, 2006, 10:53:50 PM »
When the automatic dependency solution fails, you have to do all these things by yourself.
This means: Install cpp, try to install gcc, install g++ (which will be probably another dependency) and so on.
When all dependencies are installed, you'll be able to install gcc as well.

It's not very funny, but the only way to install it this way.
Logged
Pages: [1] 2
« previous next »