aMule Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

We're back! (IN POG FORM)

Pages: 1 ... 6 7 [8] 9 10 ... 13

Author Topic: CVS Debian Packages are available  (Read 375700 times)

Uwe

  • Approved Newbie
  • *
  • Karma: 0
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 18
CryptoPP-Bug
« Reply #105 on: December 16, 2005, 05:42:47 PM »

I searched a bit in the debian bug archive of the libcrypto++-packages and I found a bug, which perhaps could be the one you told us about... (except that it seems to only affect 64bit architectures): http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=244892;archive=yes

I ran "cryptest v" on my maschine and the result was "All tests passed!" (full log attached). This test is also run from the build-scripts everytime the package is built:
Code: [Select]
# Build and run the test suite
build: config-stamp build-stamp
build-stamp: patch-stamp
        $(MAKE)
        ./cryptestcwd v
        touch $@
So I think the bug should be fixed in Debian.

UPDATE: Now I also ran all the TestVectors provided by the package and the only error I have found was when doing the testvector for Camellia:
Code: [Select]
uwe@harry:~$ cryptest tv /usr/share/crypto++/TestVectors/camellia.txt

Testing SymmetricCipher algorithm Camellia/ECB.
cryptest: misc.h:672: T CryptoPP::GetWord(bool, CryptoPP::ByteOrder, const byte*) [with T = CryptoPP::word64]: Assertion `IsAligned(block)' failed.
Abgebrochen
But as in src/CryptoPP.h it is said, that only RSA and MD4 are used, I don't think this Camellia-thing is affecting amule.
Logged

Arien

  • Newbie
  • Karma: 0
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2
Re: CVS Debian Packages are available
« Reply #106 on: December 20, 2005, 08:39:28 AM »

Just reporting:

Is there any problem with the repository?
I have found 20051220 CVS release, but apt couldn't find any 2.0.3+CVS20051220-1_i386.deb package...

Thanks!

Edit:

Ok, forget it, it's working now... sorry.
« Last Edit: December 20, 2005, 08:59:57 AM by Arien »
Logged
Just enjoy Linux...

morph

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Karma: 2
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 213
    • http://matrixhasu.altervista.org/
Re: CVS Debian Packages are available
« Reply #107 on: January 08, 2006, 06:12:14 PM »

Vollstrecker, I would be so a problem to modify debian/control so that Depends: has "libcrypto++5.2c2 | libcrypto++5.2c2a" instead of only "libcrypto++5.2c2" ? This will allow sid users to use your package without breaking release fror testing.

Uwe seems no more to updates his packages, so I'm stuck to CVS20051207 , and i find no other sid package version.

I you provide debian source packages I could do it myself every time, but I think this modification is issue-free even for you.

Let me know what you think about it.

Best Regards.
Logged

Uwe

  • Approved Newbie
  • *
  • Karma: 0
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 18
Re: CVS Debian Packages are available
« Reply #108 on: January 08, 2006, 07:03:32 PM »

sorry for not updating... i will make a package in one or two hours...

the dependencies can't be changed that way because the c2 and c2a packages aren't binary compatible beause of ABI-changes...
Logged

Vollstrecker

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Karma: 67
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1549
  • Unofficial Debian Packager
    • http://vollstreckernet.de
Re: CVS Debian Packages are available
« Reply #109 on: January 08, 2006, 07:52:36 PM »

Unfortuanatly is Uwe right, and I'm full of work with preparing the pkg's for stable. When this is done I start applying Uwes patches and then: Let's see.
Logged
Homefucking is killing prostitution

Uwe

  • Approved Newbie
  • *
  • Karma: 0
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 18
Re: CVS Debian Packages are available
« Reply #110 on: January 08, 2006, 08:48:55 PM »

the topical packages are rebuilt for sid and uploaded
« Last Edit: January 08, 2006, 08:56:55 PM by Uwe »
Logged

Arokh

  • Approved Newbie
  • *
  • Karma: 0
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 8
Re: CVS Debian Packages are available
« Reply #111 on: January 11, 2006, 12:40:45 AM »

after doing apt-get update followed by an apt-get dist-upgrade today I can't start amuled anymore.

This is the error message I get:
Code: [Select]
# amuled -f
amuled: Symbol `_ZTV16wxDatagramSocket' has different size in shared object, consider re-linking
amuled: Symbol `_ZTV14wxSocketServer' has different size in shared object, consider re-linking
amuled: Symbol `_ZTV13wxSocketEvent' has different size in shared object, consider re-linking
amuled: Symbol `_ZTV8wxObject' has different size in shared object, consider re-linking
amuled: Symbol `_ZTV16wxZipInputStream' has different size in shared object, consider re-linking
amuled: Symbol `_ZTV7wxEvent' has different size in shared object, consider re-linking
Fatal Error: Mismatch between the program and library build versions detected.
The library used 2.6 (no debug,Unicode,compiler with C++ ABI 102,wx containers,compatible with 2.4),
and your program used 2.6 (no debug,Unicode,compiler with C++ ABI 1002,wx containers,compatible with 2.4).
Abgebrochen

did I install a wrong package?
Logged

Gerd78

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Karma: 9
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 681
Re: CVS Debian Packages are available
« Reply #112 on: January 11, 2006, 01:30:52 AM »

Quote
Originally posted by Arokh
did I install a wrong package?
Yes, you installed a wxWidgets package that was compiled with GCC 3.2 or 3.3 and an aMule package that was compiled with GCC 3.4 or 4.0. These don't work together, it's exactly the ABI change that Uwe talked about. Please install both from the same origin.
Logged

Arokh

  • Approved Newbie
  • *
  • Karma: 0
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 8
Re: CVS Debian Packages are available
« Reply #113 on: January 11, 2006, 02:03:17 AM »

ok, I wasn't sure if it was the same error that Uwe explained above. In that case I'll wait untill Vollstrecker has updated his repository.

thanks for the quick answer  :)
Logged

Vollstrecker

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Karma: 67
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1549
  • Unofficial Debian Packager
    • http://vollstreckernet.de
Re: CVS Debian Packages are available
« Reply #114 on: January 11, 2006, 08:21:07 AM »

Before some errors occur. I couldn't finish the update of libcrypt++ this morning, so maybe the script doesn't builöd the pkg's, or they are unusable today.
Logged
Homefucking is killing prostitution

Uwe

  • Approved Newbie
  • *
  • Karma: 0
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 18
Re: CVS Debian Packages are available
« Reply #115 on: January 11, 2006, 02:01:59 PM »

ahh I see libcrypto++5.2c2a has finally hit testing so I will stop building extra packages for sid as it is not necessary any more. :)
Logged

Vollstrecker

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Karma: 67
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1549
  • Unofficial Debian Packager
    • http://vollstreckernet.de
Re: CVS Debian Packages are available
« Reply #116 on: January 11, 2006, 04:18:32 PM »

Jep, now it works again.
Logged
Homefucking is killing prostitution

morph

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Karma: 2
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 213
    • http://matrixhasu.altervista.org/
Re: CVS Debian Packages are available
« Reply #117 on: January 12, 2006, 07:14:01 PM »

Ya, finally I can stay in sync with CVS again (an support backtraces if needed...)

Thanks for your work, Vollstrecker!
Logged

Frisco

  • Approved Newbie
  • *
  • Karma: 0
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 38
another mismatch ?
« Reply #118 on: January 17, 2006, 04:09:47 PM »

Hello,  

I have
deb http://www.vollstreckernet.de/debian/  testing amule
deb http://www.vollstreckernet.de/debian/  stable wx

in my sources.list, which worked fine for a long time - but updating today gives me:

frisco@linux:/var/www/papaya$ amuled &
[1] 2275
frisco@linux:/var/www/papaya$ Fatal Error: Mismatch between the program and library build versions detected.
The library used 2.6 (no debug,Unicode,compiler with C++ ABI 102,wx containers,compatible with 2.4),
and your program used 2.6 (no debug,Unicode,compiler with C++ ABI 1002,wx containers,compatible with 2.4).

[1]+  Abgebrochen             amuled


I updated to 2.1.0+CVS20060116-1, not sure what the last version was, but it shouldn't been too old.

Is the problem in the binaries or do I have to change s.th.?

Thanks for helping,
Frisco

Frisco

  • Approved Newbie
  • *
  • Karma: 0
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 38
same with 2.1.0+CVS20060117-1
« Reply #119 on: January 17, 2006, 04:19:18 PM »

I've just seen that 2.1.0+CVS20060117-1 is in vollstreckers repository, but it makes no difference to me, same errors :(

André
Pages: 1 ... 6 7 [8] 9 10 ... 13