aMule Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

We're back! (IN POG FORM)

Author Topic: Kademlia again  (Read 7944 times)

xalexas

  • Approved Newbie
  • *
  • Karma: 0
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 22
Kademlia again
« on: May 20, 2005, 05:27:14 PM »

Kry, will you now start  to work on Kademlia support as you promised ? Can't wait to see Kad support!

Thanks!
Logged

thedude0001

  • evil bugfinder ;)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Karma: 6
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 827
Re: Kademlia again
« Reply #1 on: May 20, 2005, 11:20:24 PM »

I can promise you that he won't start now...

...because there has been some Kad code in amule for quite a long time now and the "real" import that was promised "after 2.0" has already started. But don't expect a Kad version next week as this isn't done that easily and will need some testing after it is done...
Logged
Das Schlimme auf dieser Welt ist
daß die Dummen so selbstsicher sind
und die Gescheiten so voller Zweifel.

xalexas

  • Approved Newbie
  • *
  • Karma: 0
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 22
Re: Kademlia again
« Reply #2 on: May 21, 2005, 09:05:03 AM »

Great! Thanks. I am really happy to hear that!
Logged

Kry

  • Ex-developer
  • Retired admin
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Karma: -665
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5795
Re: Kademlia again
« Reply #3 on: May 21, 2005, 12:17:47 PM »

I think I'll not do Kad.... next request and I'll stop it :P
Logged

BonnyFused

  • Approved Newbie
  • *
  • Karma: 0
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 31
    • http://www.bonnyfused.tk
Re: Kademlia again
« Reply #4 on: May 26, 2005, 02:09:24 PM »

Is Kad actually improving download speeds in *mule? I mean: I've noticed that on Win2k with eMule installed downloads are very fast, while on Linux with aMule it doesn't work like that.

Thanks...
Logged

skolnick

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Karma: 24
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1188
  • CentOS 6 User
Re: Kademlia again
« Reply #5 on: May 26, 2005, 06:53:58 PM »

Kad only improves a little the sped to get the sources, not the downloads themselves.

Regards.
Logged

stefanero

  • Some Support
  • Developer
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Karma: 8
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4235
Re: Kademlia again
« Reply #6 on: May 26, 2005, 07:49:53 PM »

BonnyFused you have the same credit file on win taht you have on linux?
since other then that, I cannot think there is only difference between emule and amule, since I get same speed with both of them  :]

and like skolnick said, kad only helps for sources and a little for dl, since now you can have 1source twice
the same from Kad and teh same over ed2k which might speed it a little but not very much
Logged
In its default setup, Windows XP on the Internet amounts to a car
parked in a bad part of town, with the doors unlocked, the key in
the ignition and a Post-It note on the dashboard saying, "Please
don't steal this."

BonnyFused

  • Approved Newbie
  • *
  • Karma: 0
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 31
    • http://www.bonnyfused.tk
Re: Kademlia again
« Reply #7 on: May 26, 2005, 08:40:40 PM »

Quote
Originally posted by stefanero
BonnyFused you have the same credit file on win taht you have on linux?
since other then that, I cannot think there is only difference between emule and amule, since I get same speed with both of them  :]

and like skolnick said, kad only helps for sources and a little for dl, since now you can have 1source twice
the same from Kad and teh same over ed2k which might speed it a little but not very much
Well, I actually have LESS credits on Windows than on Linux, since aMule is running since almost one year, while eMule is running since few months...

I bet KAD helps with sources, therefore I get more download "spots" and thus the overall speed gets improved...

Still waiting for KAD support on aMule, tough...
Logged

phoenix

  • Evil respawning bird from aMule Dev Team
  • Developer
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Karma: 44
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2503
  • The last shadow you'll ever see
Re: Kademlia again
« Reply #8 on: May 26, 2005, 11:00:27 PM »

BonnyFused,

Try playing a little with max. sources per file/max. connections, the optimal settings in one mule is not necessarilly the same as in the other mule.

Cheers!
Logged

skolnick

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Karma: 24
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1188
  • CentOS 6 User
Re: Kademlia again
« Reply #9 on: May 30, 2005, 04:39:03 PM »

Quote
Originally posted by stefanero
and like skolnick said, kad only helps for sources and a little for dl, since now you can have 1source twice
the same from Kad and teh same over ed2k which might speed it a little but not very much
How can you have the same source twice?? shouldn't the ed2k client check the userhash of the source before adding it to the sources list? I think emule does that, so is not possible to have the same source added via different methods (passive, ed2k, kad, etc...)

Regards.
Logged

Kry

  • Ex-developer
  • Retired admin
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Karma: -665
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5795
Re: Kademlia again
« Reply #10 on: May 30, 2005, 11:30:21 PM »

Quote
Originally posted by stefanero
and like skolnick said, kad only helps for sources and a little for dl, since now you can have 1source twice
the same from Kad and teh same over ed2k which might speed it a little but not very much


... no way
Logged

RedDungeon

  • Approved Newbie
  • *
  • Karma: 0
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 17
Re: Kademlia again
« Reply #11 on: June 01, 2005, 11:24:45 AM »

hi

A friend of me will make a I2P emule client.
But emule is only for windows!

and then is amule bether can use on other platforms too!

But at the moment cant amule Kademlia!

we need changes in kademlia, to work over I2P i dont know if will work on linux!

then must wait when is a amule with kad is avaible!
Logged

stefanero

  • Some Support
  • Developer
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Karma: 8
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4235
Re: Kademlia again
« Reply #12 on: June 01, 2005, 11:28:42 AM »

?(  yup,
whatever that ment.... :rolleyes:
Logged
In its default setup, Windows XP on the Internet amounts to a car
parked in a bad part of town, with the doors unlocked, the key in
the ignition and a Post-It note on the dashboard saying, "Please
don't steal this."

Kry

  • Ex-developer
  • Retired admin
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Karma: -665
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5795
Re: Kademlia again
« Reply #13 on: June 02, 2005, 03:45:22 AM »

I2P won't work, it has been discussed plenty of times on eMule development forums...tell your friend to spend time on ANOTHER network ;)
Logged

RedDungeon

  • Approved Newbie
  • *
  • Karma: 0
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 17
Re: Kademlia again
« Reply #14 on: June 03, 2005, 09:29:29 AM »

a gnutella client is modified for working over I2P, is i2phex!

why not work?, when nothing do with code then cant be work !

we will test if can communicate emule or amule over I2P!

it must speak with base64 destination code and must run over local proxy

like 127.0.0.1:7654 with I2P router.

we will test it with kademlia!

but amule dont have kademlia! many I2P users are linux users!

then was bether modify amule!
Logged