aMule Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

We're back! (IN POG FORM)

Author Topic: emule temp or part import?  (Read 4534 times)

flares

  • Newbie
  • Karma: 0
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1
emule temp or part import?
« on: January 13, 2004, 01:46:49 AM »

Hi - how can I import Windows emule temp files (*.part) in amule?

I am really frustrated. I tried mldonkey and now amule to continue my windows downloads on linux and no one imports my windows files correctly.  mldonkey says, it does import, but in fact it does nothing. Amule refuses to open the part files. I have tried chmod 777 on all the temp files and folders - no effect.

Who can help???

fLares
Logged

Kry

  • Ex-developer
  • Retired admin
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Karma: -665
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5795
Re: emule temp or part import?
« Reply #1 on: January 13, 2004, 03:18:57 AM »

mldonley probably changed the .part.met files? does eMule still recognise them?


I use both eMule and aMule with same met files.
Logged

stefanero

  • Some Support
  • Developer
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Karma: 8
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4235
Re: emule temp or part import?
« Reply #2 on: January 13, 2004, 09:27:05 AM »

hey flares,

what version of emule where you using last on windows? I friend of mine had problems when he tried to upgrade from emule.28 version to kad.40f. the kad version whould also net recognize the part files. so he first switched to the actuall emule verion and then over to kad and that worked fine.

but other than that I can also tell that I switched from the kad40f to amule and had also no problems with the part files, except that amule found some currupt parts in the files.

have a nice day
Logged
In its default setup, Windows XP on the Internet amounts to a car
parked in a bad part of town, with the doors unlocked, the key in
the ignition and a Post-It note on the dashboard saying, "Please
don't steal this."

McLeod

  • Newbie
  • Karma: 0
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2
Re: emule temp or part import?
« Reply #3 on: January 13, 2004, 01:47:24 PM »

I may have a similar problem as Flares. I set up my tempdir on a fat32-partion to access it from linux as well as xp.

I mount this drive on bootup and modified my /etc/fstab/ to get write access for normal users:
/dev/hdb1            /windows/D           vfat       users,guid=users,umask=0002 0 0

When I start amule as normal user at the console no tempfiles will show in the transfers window and I get the following output:

stevie@linux:~> amule
Initialising aMule
Config:
x1: 0 y1: 0 x2: 1016 y2: 740
split read, found : 394
Detected temp dir /windows/D/Donkey_Temp on fat32 mount device /windows/D, disabling chmod for that files
Detected Incoming /windows/D/Donkey_Final dir on fat32 mount device /windows/D, disabling chmod for that files
*** TCP socket at 1025
*** UDP socket at 1028
Serverlist loaded.
*** reading servers
Loading temp files from /windows/D/Donkey_Temp/*.part.met.

Any ideas what I have to change?   ?(
Logged

deltaHF

  • Evil Admin
  • Former Developer
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Karma: 6
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3920
  • .. Legends may sleep, but they never die ..
    • http://www.amule.org
Re: emule temp or part import?
« Reply #4 on: January 13, 2004, 02:13:37 PM »

mh, looks good McLeod..

vfat       users,gid=users,umask=0002,iocharset=iso8859-1,code=437 0 0

thats how it looks on my pc and everything is ok

McLeod

  • Newbie
  • Karma: 0
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2
Re: emule temp or part import?
« Reply #5 on: January 13, 2004, 05:40:46 PM »

I must have been blind! I wrote "guid=users" instead of "gid=users" in fstab... Must have been :O.

Anyway, thx for your help.
« Last Edit: January 13, 2004, 05:52:57 PM by McLeod »
Logged

deltaHF

  • Evil Admin
  • Former Developer
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Karma: 6
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3920
  • .. Legends may sleep, but they never die ..
    • http://www.amule.org
Re: emule temp or part import?
« Reply #6 on: January 13, 2004, 06:07:46 PM »

shit happens ;)

and like u see, i didn't saw it too  :rolleyes: