aMule Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

We're back! (IN POG FORM)

Pages: [1] 2

Author Topic: Open Incoming folder  (Read 7895 times)

carpelo

  • Approved Newbie
  • *
  • Karma: 0
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 8
Open Incoming folder
« on: August 28, 2005, 10:19:41 AM »
It's just an idea i saw somewhere else (emule):

it would be nice to have a button that when pressed, would open our incoming folder directly from amule.

Thanks in advance and congratulations for your work.

Carlos Pérez(Valencia, Spain)
Logged

lfroen

  • Guest
Re: Open Incoming folder
« Reply #1 on: August 28, 2005, 10:54:12 AM »
Right-click on desktop -> create link -> browse to $HOME/.aMule/Incoming -> Press ok.

Simple, isn't it ?
Logged

lionel77

  • Provider of Mac builds, Forum Mod
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Karma: 4
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1107
  • Mac OS X 10.4 (Power Mac G5)
Re: Open Incoming folder
« Reply #2 on: August 28, 2005, 10:41:10 PM »
I don't see the point of having amule just open your incoming folder. You can easily create a link somewhere as lfroen has pointed out.
What would be kinda handy (particularly for shared files) would be a function that opens the folder of the appropriate file and selects the file (so you can immediately "Get Info" it, move it, etc.). A lot of Mac programs have such a function ("Reveal in Finder") and it is pretty nice.

However, I have a feeling that a function like this would be tedious to implement, because all the code would have to be platform specific. So at this point, I don't think it should be a high priority.
Logged
Current aMule CVS builds for OS X can be found here.

thedude0001

  • evil bugfinder ;)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Karma: 6
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 827
Re: Open Incoming folder
« Reply #3 on: August 29, 2005, 12:27:15 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by lionel77
However, I have a feeling that a function like this would be tedious to implement, because all the code would have to be platform specific. So at this point, I don't think it should be a high priority.

And another question on *NIX would be "Open it in what?" Konqueror? mc? gentoo (the GTK file browser, not the distro)? The "I-just-don't remember-it's-name" GNOME file browser?
Logged
Das Schlimme auf dieser Welt ist
daß die Dummen so selbstsicher sind
und die Gescheiten so voller Zweifel.

Jacobo221

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Karma: 3
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2712
Re: Open Incoming folder
« Reply #4 on: August 29, 2005, 01:03:24 PM »
indeed the only reason why it's not being added is thedude0001's reason. Since there already is a mess with the browser selection. No need for mor such messes ;)
Logged

wuischke

  • Developer
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Karma: 183
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4292
Re: Open Incoming folder
« Reply #5 on: August 29, 2005, 01:39:04 PM »
@dude nautilus ;)
Maybe you should use an editbox for this, where the user has to enter the name.
Logged

stefanero

  • Some Support
  • Developer
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Karma: 8
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4235
Re: Open Incoming folder
« Reply #6 on: August 29, 2005, 01:55:14 PM »
dont we do the same for the webbrowser and our websearch and fake-check function
Logged
In its default setup, Windows XP on the Internet amounts to a car
parked in a bad part of town, with the doors unlocked, the key in
the ignition and a Post-It note on the dashboard saying, "Please
don't steal this."

Jacobo221

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Karma: 3
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2712
Re: Open Incoming folder
« Reply #7 on: August 29, 2005, 02:31:54 PM »
so... you propose to have an edit/selection box for:
*web browser
*file browser
*text editor
*...

?
Logged

lfroen

  • Guest
Re: Open Incoming folder
« Reply #8 on: August 29, 2005, 02:44:01 PM »
@dude: we have "Desktop integration mode" in preferences. We support tray icon both in KDE and in GNOME. Similary, we should open konqueror in KDE and Nautilus in GNOME according to this preference.

Moreover, correct integration implies that we could provide "Open with" dialog - same as underlying desktop (both kde and gnome have it).

I have no idea why this function is better that creating link on desktop, but it definitly can be implemented.
Logged

thedude0001

  • evil bugfinder ;)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Karma: 6
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 827
Re: Open Incoming folder
« Reply #9 on: August 29, 2005, 05:37:39 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by lfroen
@dude: we have "Desktop integration mode" in preferences. We support tray icon both in KDE and in GNOME. Similary, we should open konqueror in KDE and Nautilus in GNOME according to this preference.

Hmm, I just triple-checked my preferences and couldn't find anything about a "Desktop integration mode"?

Anyway, I second your opinion, lfroen. It sure can be implemented, I just don't see the big advantage...
Logged
Das Schlimme auf dieser Welt ist
daß die Dummen so selbstsicher sind
und die Gescheiten so voller Zweifel.

Kry

  • Ex-developer
  • Retired admin
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Karma: -665
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5795
Re: Open Incoming folder
« Reply #10 on: August 29, 2005, 06:25:08 PM »
That only appears on wx 2.4 and it's strongly disadvised to use.
Logged

stefanero

  • Some Support
  • Developer
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Karma: 8
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4235
Re: Open Incoming folder
« Reply #11 on: August 29, 2005, 06:25:22 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by thedude0001
Quote
Originally posted by lfroen
@dude: we have "Desktop integration mode" in preferences. We support tray icon both in KDE and in GNOME. Similary, we should open konqueror in KDE and Nautilus in GNOME according to this preference.

Hmm, I just triple-checked my preferences and couldn't find anything about a "Desktop integration mode"?

Anyway, I second your opinion, lfroen. It sure can be implemented, I just don't see the big advantage...

thedude with wxGTK-2.6 we "automatically" ahve this function included in wx. so when you enable systray in prefs amule detects himself if you run gnome or kde

with wx-2.4 you still have those little checkboxes for kde/gnome but with wx-2.6 this is simple gone
Logged
In its default setup, Windows XP on the Internet amounts to a car
parked in a bad part of town, with the doors unlocked, the key in
the ignition and a Post-It note on the dashboard saying, "Please
don't steal this."

thedude0001

  • evil bugfinder ;)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Karma: 6
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 827
Re: Open Incoming folder
« Reply #12 on: August 29, 2005, 09:13:55 PM »
Ah, well, I use windowmaker on the computer running amule, which has no systray...
Logged
Das Schlimme auf dieser Welt ist
daß die Dummen so selbstsicher sind
und die Gescheiten so voller Zweifel.

carpelo

  • Approved Newbie
  • *
  • Karma: 0
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 8
Re: Open Incoming folder
« Reply #13 on: September 04, 2005, 11:49:34 AM »
------------------------------
LFROEN SAID:
" Right-click on desktop -> create link -> browse to $HOME/.aMule/Incoming -> Press ok.

Simple, isn't it ? "
------------------------------

 ?(

So simple that i already had it before i wrote my post.  But it's not what i was asking for, if you read again my post.

I was asking for a new amule feature, as i have seen on emule clients, and it's quite interesting (IMHO) as you can open folder categories, files, etc.... directly from the client.
Logged

lfroen

  • Guest
Re: Open Incoming folder
« Reply #14 on: September 04, 2005, 05:49:06 PM »
carpelo: Lemme quote you (for correctness sake):
Quote
it would be nice to have a button that when pressed, would open our incoming folder directly from amule.

And compare it with:

Quote
" Right-click on desktop -> create link -> browse to $HOME/.aMule/Incoming -> Press ok.

Don't know about you, but personally, I see no difference.
Opening per-category folder is another story, but considering code complexity vs. usefullness - I would give it quite low priority.
Consider this: such feature is desktop-specific. Meaning, code is different on gnome and kde. If we link to both libs, people that using binary packages must have all those libs too ! Which add install complexity.
Logged
Pages: [1] 2
« previous next »