aMule Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

We're back! (IN POG FORM)

Pages: [1] 2

Author Topic: Known bug  (Read 327315 times)

Kry

  • Ex-developer
  • Retired admin
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Karma: -665
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5795
Known bug
« on: January 23, 2006, 11:18:03 AM »
Today's tarball will rehash all your files AND give errors about it. Blame Xaignar :)

(It's safe, but highly annoying - 99% CPU while hashing)
Logged

Armin76

  • Approved Newbie
  • *
  • Karma: 0
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 12
Re: Known bug
« Reply #1 on: January 23, 2006, 12:30:11 PM »
For me its OK, that means that the team keep working on aMule, and thats a good thing.
Logged

Kry

  • Ex-developer
  • Retired admin
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Karma: -665
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5795
Re: Known bug
« Reply #2 on: January 23, 2006, 12:42:05 PM »
Now THAT is the spirit :)
Logged

Fab-Ko

  • Newbie
  • Karma: 0
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4
Re: Known bug
« Reply #3 on: January 23, 2006, 01:31:04 PM »
Can i use the actuall tarball, without the risk of killing my files?  ?(

@kry: do you have resolved this silly KAD-Reconnect-Bug?

Greets
Fab-Ko

P.S.: Nice work, amuled rules ;)
Logged

Kry

  • Ex-developer
  • Retired admin
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Karma: -665
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5795
Re: Known bug
« Reply #4 on: January 23, 2006, 01:55:46 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Fab-Ko
Can i use the actuall tarball, without the risk of killing my files?  ?(

I said that it's annoying but safe on the first post. "Safe" as in usually tarball safeness.

Quote
Originally posted by Fab-Ko
@kry: do you have resolved this silly KAD-Reconnect-Bug?

As I stated on the threads, I can't fix a bug that I can't see.

Quote
Originally posted by Fab-Ko
P.S.: Nice work, amuled rules ;)

Thanks :)
Logged

thedude0001

  • evil bugfinder ;)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Karma: 6
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 827
Re: Known bug
« Reply #5 on: January 23, 2006, 02:35:16 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Fab-Ko
Can i use the actuall tarball, without the risk of killing my files?  ?(

No, you can't. But that basically goes for ALL SVN tarballs. Guys, the tarballs are for people who want the bleeding edge of untested code. Coders make mistakes, and if they don't find them themselves the users of the tarballs are probably the ones who find those bugs. And "bug" can always mean "catastrophic failure". If you're not OK with that go use the stable version which is well tested ;)
Logged
Das Schlimme auf dieser Welt ist
daß die Dummen so selbstsicher sind
und die Gescheiten so voller Zweifel.

Xaignar

  • Admin and Code Junky
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Karma: 19
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1103
Re: Known bug
« Reply #6 on: January 23, 2006, 04:11:36 PM »
Hey, nobody's perfect. :P
Logged

Kry

  • Ex-developer
  • Retired admin
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Karma: -665
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5795
Re: Known bug
« Reply #7 on: January 23, 2006, 05:26:40 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Xaignar
Hey, nobody's perfect. :P

I am nobody!
Logged

Fab-Ko

  • Newbie
  • Karma: 0
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4
Re: Known bug
« Reply #8 on: January 23, 2006, 11:47:02 PM »
I'm a gentoo-user, i want the bleeding edge ;)

But these KAD don't reconnect problem ist still there... is already on the Bugtracker.

and... the amulegui can connect right now, without errors :D

THX  :baby:
Logged

Austiniste

  • Approved Newbie
  • *
  • Karma: 0
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 32
Re: Known bug
« Reply #9 on: January 24, 2006, 02:23:18 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Xaignar
Hey, nobody's perfect. :P

Except me ! :] :P ;)
Logged
Qui peut le plus peut le moins....l'inverse est plus dur !! ;-)

Kry

  • Ex-developer
  • Retired admin
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Karma: -665
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5795
Re: Known bug
« Reply #10 on: January 24, 2006, 07:58:48 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Fab-Ko
But these KAD don't reconnect problem ist still there... is already on the Bugtracker.

I said it millions of times and I'm starting to get fed up on it: I DON'T see the bug, so I CAN'T fix it.
Logged

OldFrog

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Karma: 31
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 385
Re: Known bug
« Reply #11 on: January 29, 2006, 12:02:18 PM »
Maybe stupid me (not the first ime), but I have some concerns with current snapshot (Jan 29th).
I already ran snapshots since Jan 24th and the infamous rehashing thing ( :-P ) but didn't pay attention as I was not home.
But as of today, I have these :

* no icon in systray (1h after amule started)
* no gui
* 70% to 90% CPU use, not constant, so I doubt it's in a loop, and only 2.2% memory used

Code: [Select]
Mem:    515440k total,   480040k used,    35400k free,    25888k buffers
Swap:   506008k total,   178740k used,   327268k free,   209752k cached

  PID USER      PR  NI  VIRT  RES  SHR S %CPU %MEM    TIME+  COMMAND
18830 louis     25   0  131m  11m 6396 R 92.1  2.2  52:41.26 amule
 5090 louis     39  19 17440 1320  368 R  4.7  0.3   7:36.44 FahCore_82.exe
 4999 root      15   0  123m  48m 3204 S  2.3  9.6   3:56.99 X
18792 louis     15   0 29036 7800 6200 S  0.3  1.5   0:01.95 konsole


It runs as I can see in the terminal

Quote
mule --I-am-scared-of-no-dangerous-code
Initialising aMule
Checking if there is an instance already running...
No other instances are running.
HTTP download thread started
Loading temp files from /mnt/stockage.
Loading PartFile 1 of 1
All PartFiles Loaded.
ListenSocket: Ok.

*** TCP socket (ECServer) listening on 0.0.0.0:8008
*** Server UDP socket (TCP+3) at 0.0.0.0:8005
*** TCP socket (TCP) listening on 0.0.0.0:8002
*** Client UDP socket (extended eMule) at 0.0.0.0:8006
Adding file /mnt/stockage/003.part.met to shares
Empty dir /mnt/ shared
Host: amule.sourceforge.net:80
URL: http://amule.sourceforge.net/lastversion
Response: 200 (Error: 0)
Download size: 6
HTTP download thread ended

I share ~126 files, mean size is ~400MB

What should I do doctor, kill the poor thing so it doesn't suffer any more ?

Or is it re-hashing again
« Last Edit: January 29, 2006, 12:04:50 PM by OldFrog »
Logged
Computer Science is no more about computers than astronomy is about telescopes (Edsger W. Dijkstra)

OldFrog

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Karma: 31
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 385
Re: Known bug
« Reply #12 on: January 29, 2006, 12:09:32 PM »
I killed it and started it again. I can see the gui loading, and the icon. the kad connects at first, then it looks for ed2k servers

But as soon as it's connected to a ed2k server, I can't retrieve the gui again (no action on dbl/click or right-click on the icon), and CPU use is up to 90%.

Computing will never be a true science  :rolleyes:
« Last Edit: January 29, 2006, 12:13:06 PM by OldFrog »
Logged
Computer Science is no more about computers than astronomy is about telescopes (Edsger W. Dijkstra)

Xaignar

  • Admin and Code Junky
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Karma: 19
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1103
Re: Known bug
« Reply #13 on: January 29, 2006, 12:10:58 PM »
OldFrog: Try removing the known2*.met files from your .aMule folder.
Logged

OldFrog

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Karma: 31
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 385
Re: Known bug
« Reply #14 on: January 29, 2006, 12:22:36 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Xaignar
OldFrog: Try removing the known2*.met files from your .aMule folder.

Ok, thanks for the tip.

Did it and same punishment.

Anyway, I found out I messed my libs, and compiled again wxGtk-2.6.2u-nosdl (all patched ) instead of wxGtk-CVS (pre-2.7) I usually have. So I'll build again and give it a try. Stay on air !
Logged
Computer Science is no more about computers than astronomy is about telescopes (Edsger W. Dijkstra)
Pages: [1] 2
« previous next »