aMule Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

We're back! (IN POG FORM)

Author Topic: Ubuntu  (Read 24607 times)

wuischke

  • Developer
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Karma: 183
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4292
Ubuntu
« on: May 28, 2006, 06:44:26 PM »
The package is built on Dapper, I don't know whether it will work on Breezy as well.

It uses wxGTK 2.6.3 (with patches) which I've built on Breezy, but it worked flawlessly after the upgrade. You probably have to force-install (dpkg -i --force-all), because it conflicts with Ubuntu wxGTK.
-- Use new package from below! --


It is compiled with the following options:
Quote
./configure --enable-optimize --enable-amule-daemon --enable-amulecmd --enable-webserver --enable-amule-gui --enable-cas --enable-wxcas --enable-alc --enable-alcc

Download: http://www.savefile.com/files/6281972

Have fun!
« Last Edit: June 04, 2006, 05:36:57 PM by wuischke »
Logged

dreamerwolf

  • Approved Newbie
  • *
  • Karma: 0
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 16
Re: Ubuntu
« Reply #1 on: May 28, 2006, 06:49:46 PM »
To get my gpg pub key (optional)

$wget http://twemu.no-ip.org/apt/Pub.key
$sudo apt-key add Pub.key

It will make upgrade as usual.

add /etc/apt/sources.list:

##Amule 2.1.1 for Breezy
#deb http://twemu.no-ip.org/apt/amule/ ./
#deb-src http://twemu.no-ip.org/apt/amule/ ./
#Amule 2.1.2 for Breezy (testing)
deb http://twemu.no-ip.org/apt/amule-testing/breezy/ ./
deb-src http://twemu.no-ip.org/apt/amule-testing/breezy/ ./
#Amule 2.1.2 for Dapper (testing)
deb http://twemu.no-ip.org/apt/amule-testing/dapper/ ./
deb-src http://twemu.no-ip.org/apt/amule-testing/dapper/ ./

#mirror apt.ubuntu.org.tw
##Amule 2.1.1 for Breezy
#deb http://apt.ubuntu.org.tw/ubtw/ ./
#deb-src http://apt.ubuntu.org.tw/ubtw/amule/ ./
#Amule 2.1.2 for Breezy (testing)
deb http://apt.ubuntu.org.tw/ubtw-testing/ ./
deb-src http://apt.ubuntu.org.tw/ubtw-testing/amule/ ./
« Last Edit: June 01, 2006, 01:30:33 AM by dreamerwolf »
Logged

stefanero

  • Some Support
  • Developer
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Karma: 8
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4235
Re: Ubuntu
« Reply #2 on: May 28, 2006, 10:44:35 PM »
dreamwolf can you make a clear post what source entry you need for what version? this is kinda a mess here..

otherwise I cant add it to the main ubuntu thread
Logged
In its default setup, Windows XP on the Internet amounts to a car
parked in a bad part of town, with the doors unlocked, the key in
the ignition and a Post-It note on the dashboard saying, "Please
don't steal this."

Treviño

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Karma: 2
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 50
    • http://italy.copybase.ch/blog/
aMule 2.1.2 for Breezy
« Reply #3 on: May 29, 2006, 01:59:31 AM »
Hello, I've compiled and packaged aMule 2.1.2 for Breezy.

I've made two versions, one for x86 CPUs and the other optimized for 686 CPUs...

You can download all from http://italy.copybase.ch/blog/xtra/uscito-amule-212-pacchetto-deb-ubuntu/

Compiled using this configuration string:
Code: [Select]
./configure prefix=/usr mandir=\${prefix}/share/man infodir=\${prefix}/share/info enable-optimize enable-amule-daemon enable-amulecmd enable-webserver enable-amule-gui enable-wxcas enable-alc
PS: In my package I've also fixed the aMule icon... :P
« Last Edit: May 29, 2006, 02:03:11 AM by Treviño »
Logged

Vollstrecker

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Karma: 67
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1549
  • Unofficial Debian Packager
    • http://vollstreckernet.de
Re: Ubuntu
« Reply #4 on: May 29, 2006, 07:26:18 AM »
What does fixed the amule-icon mean? The only thing is a lintian warning that it is too big, but that was never never a problem.
Logged
Homefucking is killing prostitution

Treviño

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Karma: 2
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 50
    • http://italy.copybase.ch/blog/
Re: Ubuntu
« Reply #5 on: May 29, 2006, 05:13:23 PM »
I've changed the icon with a better one...
This is the one I see if I compile and install the official package on my Kubuntu:


Really bad...  8o
Logged

thedude0001

  • evil bugfinder ;)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Karma: 6
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 827
Re: Ubuntu
« Reply #6 on: May 30, 2006, 02:50:04 AM »
dreamerwolf: we've had reports about your debs not working with dapper, so I removed that in the sticky thread and just left breezy. There seems to be a problem with your dependencies:
the deb requires libcrypto++5.2c2, however dapper's current version is libcrypto++5.2c2a. Can you please check on that?
Logged
Das Schlimme auf dieser Welt ist
daß die Dummen so selbstsicher sind
und die Gescheiten so voller Zweifel.

Treviño

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Karma: 2
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 50
    • http://italy.copybase.ch/blog/
Re: Ubuntu
« Reply #7 on: May 31, 2006, 12:00:50 AM »
My breezy package works also in Dapper.
Just remove amule-common amule-utils amule-utils-gui amule-daemon packages, and install my package. Reported to work.
Bye ;)
Logged

dreamerwolf

  • Approved Newbie
  • *
  • Karma: 0
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 16
Re: Ubuntu
« Reply #8 on: May 31, 2006, 07:09:53 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by thedude0001
dreamerwolf: we've had reports about your debs not working with dapper, so I removed that in the sticky thread and just left breezy. There seems to be a problem with your dependencies:
the deb requires libcrypto++5.2c2, however dapper's current version is libcrypto++5.2c2a. Can you please check on that?
I fixed it.
Please try dapper package.
If it works, I will sign the key.
Logged

Eleka

  • Approved Newbie
  • *
  • Karma: 0
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 49
    • http://eleka2.dyndns.org
Re: Ubuntu
« Reply #9 on: May 31, 2006, 10:32:36 AM »
Why not build different packages with amule, amule-daemon, amule-remote-gui, etc in the way that debian packages?

I use Debian packages and have a little problem with compilers versions and it would be nice if we build dapper versions (I would help compiling packages for i386 and amd64, but I need helps and rules for make de deb packages).
Logged

wuischke

  • Developer
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Karma: 183
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4292
Re: Ubuntu
« Reply #10 on: May 31, 2006, 10:51:23 AM »
Maybe you find some help here: http://forum.amule.org/thread.php?threadid=9583
(And I was still not far enough in reading the guide to build according packages... :] )
Logged

wuischke

  • Developer
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Karma: 183
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4292
Re: Ubuntu
« Reply #11 on: June 04, 2006, 06:22:06 PM »
I've build a new package for wxGTK 2.6.3 which doesn't conflict with original Ubuntu ones anymore. It installs to /usr/local/lib which is NOT in $LD_LIBRARY_PATH by default.
To solve this, execute the following code in a terminal.
Code: [Select]
sudo -s
echo /usr/local/lib >> /etc/ld.so.conf
ldconfig
exit
Download: http://www.savefile.com/files.php?fid=3449927
Logged