aMule Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

We're back! (IN POG FORM)

Author Topic: Question: --enable-static option make a faster amule?  (Read 2927 times)

PunkSC

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Karma: 0
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 73
Question: --enable-static option make a faster amule?
« on: May 18, 2005, 11:31:44 PM »
I know, sounds a silly question, but i read somewhere (dont remember where) that if i compile using "--enable-static" i will have a faster amule, but the amule file will be huge. I dont care about disk space, but i can use a faster amule.
So, my question is:
- amule will really be faster with this option?

tks a lot!
Logged

stefanero

  • Some Support
  • Developer
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Karma: 8
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4235
Re: Question: --enable-static option make a faster amule?
« Reply #1 on: May 19, 2005, 08:08:56 AM »
not for dl, only for startup...
Logged
In its default setup, Windows XP on the Internet amounts to a car
parked in a bad part of town, with the doors unlocked, the key in
the ignition and a Post-It note on the dashboard saying, "Please
don't steal this."

PunkSC

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Karma: 0
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 73
Re: Question: --enable-static option make a faster amule?
« Reply #2 on: May 19, 2005, 08:01:26 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by stefanero
not for dl, only for startup...
for sure the dl/ul speed will be the same. But i run amule on a PII 300 Mhz computer. If amule can use less cpu, it will be awesome!
But, it will just have a faster startup, or it will use less resources while amule is running?
Btw: any idea of the size of amule with this option? (near 10 MB, 50 MB, 100 MB, 1 GB?)
« Last Edit: May 19, 2005, 08:02:35 PM by PunkSC »
Logged

stefanero

  • Some Support
  • Developer
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Karma: 8
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4235
Re: Question: --enable-static option make a faster amule?
« Reply #3 on: May 19, 2005, 08:38:10 PM »
I think it was arount 150mb,
but also resources usage will be the same, the only difference will be that because wxGTK/wxBase will be included it will start more quickly, the rest will stay the same...
Logged
In its default setup, Windows XP on the Internet amounts to a car
parked in a bad part of town, with the doors unlocked, the key in
the ignition and a Post-It note on the dashboard saying, "Please
don't steal this."